Re: [RFC PATCH v1 01/15] x86/msr: Replace __wrmsr() with native_wrmsrl()

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


(追記) (追記ここまで)



On 4/1/2025 12:52 AM, Ingo Molnar wrote:
Should we rename the *msrl() functions to *msrq() as part of this
overhaul?
Yeah, that's a good idea, and because talk is cheap I just implemented
this in the tip:WIP.x86/msr branch with a couple of other cleanups in
this area (see the shortlog & diffstat below), but the churn is high:
 144 files changed, 1034 insertions(+), 1034 deletions(-)
Hi Ingo,
I noticed that you keep the type of MSR index in these patches as
"unsigned int".
I'm thinking would it be better to standardize it as "u32"?
Because:
1) MSR index is placed in ECX to execute MSR instructions, and the
 high-order 32 bits of RCX are ignored on 64-bit.
2) MSR index is encoded as a 32-bit immediate in the new immediate form
 MSR instructions.
Thanks!
 Xin

[Index of Archives] [Linux Filesystems] [Linux SCSI] [Linux RAID] [Git] [Kernel Newbies] [Linux Newbie] [Security] [Netfilter] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite News] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Samba] [Device Mapper]

(追記) (追記ここまで)
Powered by Linux

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /