Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option

(追記) (追記ここまで)

• Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option
• From: Askar Safin <safinaskar@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
• Date: Wed, 6 Aug 2025 13:25:01 +0300
• Cc: amir73il@xxxxxxxxx, brauner@xxxxxxxxxx, corbet@xxxxxxx, jack@xxxxxxx, linux-api@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-doc@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-fsdevel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kernel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, linux-kselftest@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx, luto@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx, shuah@xxxxxxxxxx, viro@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
• Feedback-id: rr08011227cd007dd0b9c9dcb652e3ba8400007454c63885fa4739e1a2448e2dfcd94715a18ae97a0dffae61:zu08011227eb8290984d483d5d1a43e04000005dc1ce89a5e53403a5117830c5dff694efbf2d6162e2802556:rf0801122c8cf1f5d05d0e16bf0447132600008990b2a0cdb4e3567989e390629257cc551dc8fb0a863a8c551d183331cc:ZohoMail
• In-reply-to: <2025年08月05日.1754378656-steep-harps-muscled-mailroom-lively-gosling-VVGNTP@cyphar.com>
• References: <2025年08月05日.1754378656-steep-harps-muscled-mailroom-lively-gosling-VVGNTP@cyphar.com>

> I just realised that we probably also want to support FSCONFIG_SET_PATH
I just checked kernel code. Indeed nobody uses FSCONFIG_SET_PATH. Moreover, fsparam_path macro is present since 5.1. And for all this time nobody used it. So, let's just remove FSCONFIG_SET_PATH. Nobody used it, so this will not break anything.
If you okay with that, I can submit patch, removing it.
--
Askar Safin

• Follow-Ups:
  • Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option
    • From: Aleksa Sarai

• References:
  • Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option
    • From: Aleksa Sarai

• Prev by Date: [PATCH v2 2/2] vfs: output mount_too_revealing() errors to fscontext
• Next by Date: Re: [PATCH v2 31/32] libluo: introduce luoctl
• Previous by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option
• Next by thread: Re: [PATCH v4 2/4] procfs: add "pidns" mount option
• Index(es):
  • Date
  • Thread