On Tue, Jul 29 2025 at 13:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: > On Wed, Jul 23, 2025 at 02:46:44PM +0000, Pasha Tatashin wrote: >> From: Pratyush Yadav <ptyadav@xxxxxxxxx> >> tools/lib/luo/Makefile | 6 +- >> tools/lib/luo/cli/.gitignore | 1 + >> tools/lib/luo/cli/Makefile | 18 ++++ >> tools/lib/luo/cli/luoctl.c | 178 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ >> 4 files changed, 202 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> create mode 100644 tools/lib/luo/cli/.gitignore >> create mode 100644 tools/lib/luo/cli/Makefile >> create mode 100644 tools/lib/luo/cli/luoctl.c > > In the calls I thought the plan had changed to put libluo in its own > repository? > > There is nothing tightly linked to the kernel here, I think it would > be easier on everyone to not add ordinary libraries to the kernel > tree. As this is an evolving mechanism, having the corresponding library in the kernel similar to what we do with perf and other things makes a lot of sense. Thanks, tglx