Re: [PATCH] push: fix --force-if-includes when remote-tracking ref has no reflog

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]




Aleksei Sviridkin <f@xxxxxx> writes:
> Junio C Hamano <gitster@xxxxxxxxx> writes:
>> your sign-off must be the last line in the trailers.
>
> I took Assisted-by from the kernel, which asks for it. I could not find
> anything either way in git's guidelines, so I followed the kernel. I will
> put the sign-off last in v2, and drop Assisted-by if you would rather not
> have it.
We are not the kernel ;-)
Quite honestly, I would rather not have patches filled with AI slop
that is often walls of text filled with "eh, that may not be wrong
per-se, but is it relevant?" descriptions and we can never tell what
was used as the original material to copy from. I prefer patches
with human-readable explanations and known origin.
Thanks.

[Index of Archives] [Linux Kernel Development] [Gcc Help] [IETF Annouce] [DCCP] [Netdev] [Networking] [Security] [V4L] [Bugtraq] [Yosemite] [MIPS Linux] [ARM Linux] [Linux Security] [Linux RAID] [Linux SCSI] [Fedora Users]

(追記) (追記ここまで)
Powered by Linux

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /