Re: Virtualization guest reports: kvm VS microsoft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

(追記) (追記ここまで)

To: users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Subject: Re: Virtualization guest reports: kvm VS microsoft
From: lejeczek via Users <users@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: 2025年12月31日 10:46:44 +0100
In-reply-to: <fb10c9ef-a094-4c98-8690-7ecc079541bb@yahoo.co.uk>
References: <fb10c9ef-a094-4c98-8690-7ecc079541bb.ref@yahoo.co.uk> <fb10c9ef-a094-4c98-8690-7ecc079541bb@yahoo.co.uk>
Reply-to: lejeczek <peljasz@xxxxxxxxxxx>
User-agent: Mozilla Thunderbird

to share an answer - probably obvious & known to those who did windowze - use of 'hyperv' does that. (I got it off 'virt-install' while did not pay good attention with my later tampering)

Prev by Date: Virtualization guest reports: kvm VS microsoft
Next by Date: Qemu/libvirt with gpu acceleration on c9 ?
Previous by thread: Virtualization guest reports: kvm VS microsoft
Next by thread: Qemu/libvirt with gpu acceleration on c9 ?
Index(es):
- Date
- Thread

[Index of Archives] [Virt Tools] [Lib OS Info] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

(追記) (追記ここまで)

Powered by Linux