RFC: licensing issue with lft

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


(追記) (追記ここまで)



(追記) (追記ここまで)

I picked up the lft (Layer Four Traceroute, http://pwhois.org/lft/)
after it was orphaned a while back. I am not familiar with what
happened to the package before I picked it up or how it made it into
Fedora in the first place. Now there's a new version out, but also
the license (the "VOSTROM Public License") is strange and had never
been officially checked for acceptability in Fedora. The package also
requires a rebuild to pick up the buildID changes.
So, since the feature freeze is Tuesday, should I:
Leave License: tag as is (even though it's not listed in the
acceptable list) and push updated version to rawhide?
Leave License: tag as is, push a plain rebuild to rawhide?
Assume the license is non-free and remove the package from rawhide?
 - J<
--
Fedora-maintainers mailing list
Fedora-maintainers@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers
--
Fedora-maintainers-readonly mailing list
Fedora-maintainers-readonly@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-maintainers-readonly

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Users] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Devel Java] [Fedora Legacy] [Fedora Desktop] [Fedora SELinux] [Big List of Linux Books] [Yosemite News] [KDE Users]

(追記) (追記ここまで)
Powered by Linux

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /