Re: Friday Flames - What to do with RHL7.3/9 and FC1/2

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]


(追記) (追記ここまで)



(追記) (追記ここまで)

On 6/14/06, Jesse Keating <jkeating@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Tue, 2006年06月13日 at 22:48 -0700, Tim Thome wrote:
> No, I'm not using RH9, however, a lot of folks are... and they paid for it.
Paid who for it? I certainly didn't get any money here...
> Part of the obligation of the Legacy Support team is to support folks for a period. Although it would be nice for RH to support RH9 directly, folks have signed up within the Fedora Legacy camp to do this.
I would assume Tim meant people paid RH for support under the idea
that you paid RH for a boxed set for x years of updates. If a person
bought a boxed set, what they were paying for was 90 days of
installation technical support, and depending on the level of the
boxed set a number of priority tickets that could be used in a year.
You also got a printed installation manual and some stickers. You did
not get any written promise of errata support for any period of time.
--
Stephen J Smoogen.
CSIRT/Linux System Administrator
--
fedora-legacy-list@xxxxxxxxxx
https://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-legacy-list

[Index of Archives] [Fedora Development] [Fedora Announce] [Fedora Legacy Announce] [Fedora Config] [PAM] [Fedora General Discussion] [Big List of Linux Books] [Gimp] [Yosemite Questions]

(追記) (追記ここまで)
Powered by Linux

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /