Golang http.DefaultClient 连接服务端压测时出现大量TIME_WAIT异常
fdhay · · 4865 次点击 · · 开始浏览今天在做一个压测场景时,通过golang作为client去连接服务,在client的服务器上出现大量的TIME_WAIT连接。经过查找资料,得到解决,参考如下:
The default http.Transport is opening and closing connections too quickly. Since all connections are to the same host:port combination, you need to increase MaxIdleConnsPerHost to match your value for num_coroutines. Otherwise, the transport will frequently close the extra connections, only to have them reopened immediately.
You can set this globally on the default transport:
http.DefaultTransport.(*http.Transport).MaxIdleConnsPerHost = numCoroutines
Or when creating your own transport
t := &http.Transport{
Proxy: http.ProxyFromEnvironment,
DialContext: (&net.Dialer{
Timeout: 30 * time.Second,
KeepAlive: 30 * time.Second,
}).DialContext,
MaxIdleConnsPerHost: numCoroutines,
MaxIdleConns: 100,
IdleConnTimeout: 90 * time.Second,
TLSHandshakeTimeout: 10 * time.Second,
ExpectContinueTimeout: 1 * time.Second,
}
有疑问加站长微信联系(非本文作者)
入群交流(和以上内容无关):加入Go大咖交流群,或添加微信:liuxiaoyan-s 备注:入群;或加QQ群:692541889
关注微信- 请尽量让自己的回复能够对别人有帮助
- 支持 Markdown 格式, **粗体**、~~删除线~~、
`单行代码` - 支持 @ 本站用户;支持表情(输入 : 提示),见 Emoji cheat sheet
- 图片支持拖拽、截图粘贴等方式上传
收入到我管理的专栏 新建专栏
今天在做一个压测场景时,通过golang作为client去连接服务,在client的服务器上出现大量的TIME_WAIT连接。经过查找资料,得到解决,参考如下:
The default http.Transport is opening and closing connections too quickly. Since all connections are to the same host:port combination, you need to increase MaxIdleConnsPerHost to match your value for num_coroutines. Otherwise, the transport will frequently close the extra connections, only to have them reopened immediately.
You can set this globally on the default transport:
http.DefaultTransport.(*http.Transport).MaxIdleConnsPerHost = numCoroutines
Or when creating your own transport
t := &http.Transport{
Proxy: http.ProxyFromEnvironment,
DialContext: (&net.Dialer{
Timeout: 30 * time.Second,
KeepAlive: 30 * time.Second,
}).DialContext,
MaxIdleConnsPerHost: numCoroutines,
MaxIdleConns: 100,
IdleConnTimeout: 90 * time.Second,
TLSHandshakeTimeout: 10 * time.Second,
ExpectContinueTimeout: 1 * time.Second,
}