You should avoid hard-coded waits like waitForTimeout(3000), because they make tests brittle and slow. Instead, you should wait for a concrete signal that the table has updated, using Playwright's locator-based assertions or visibility/state checks.
Root-Cause Solution: Wait for a Reliable Change in the Table
Assuming that after submitting the form, the admin user appears as a new row in the table, here’s how you should structure your code:
Option 1: Wait for a specific row/text to appear in the table:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for the user row to appear (use unique identifier like email/username)
await expect(page.locator('table')).toContainText('[email protected]');
Option 2: Wait for the number of rows to increase (if table rows are stable)
Before submitting:
const rowsBefore = await page.locator('table tbody tr').count();
After submitting:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for one more row to appear
await expect
.poll(async () => await page.locator('table tbody tr').count())
.toBe(rowsBefore + 1);
Option 3: Wait for a table loader/spinner to disappear (if applicable)
If the table shows a loading spinner or "Loading..." message during the refresh:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for spinner to appear and disappear
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'visible' });
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'hidden' });
// OR wait until "Loading..." text disappears
await expect(page.locator('text=Loading...')).toHaveCount(0);
Notes:
Avoid this in all cases:
await page.waitForTimeout(3000); // hard-coded, fragile
Do this insteadSummary:
Use expect(locator).toContainText(...) for data presence.
Use .count() tracking to wait for table updates.
Use .waitFor({ state: 'visible' | 'hidden' }) on spinners/loaders.
Don’t rely on fixed timeouts. Instead, wait for meaningful UI changes — like the presence of user info, row count increase, or a loading indicator disappearing.
You should avoid hard-coded waits like waitForTimeout(3000), because they make tests brittle and slow. Instead, you should wait for a concrete signal that the table has updated, using Playwright's locator-based assertions or visibility/state checks.
Root-Cause Solution: Wait for a Reliable Change in the Table
Assuming that after submitting the form, the admin user appears as a new row in the table, here’s how you should structure your code:
Option 1: Wait for a specific row/text to appear in the table:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for the user row to appear (use unique identifier like email/username)
await expect(page.locator('table')).toContainText('[email protected]');
Option 2: Wait for the number of rows to increase (if table rows are stable)
Before submitting:
const rowsBefore = await page.locator('table tbody tr').count();
After submitting:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for one more row to appear
await expect
.poll(async () => await page.locator('table tbody tr').count())
.toBe(rowsBefore + 1);
Option 3: Wait for a table loader/spinner to disappear (if applicable)
If the table shows a loading spinner or "Loading..." message during the refresh:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for spinner to appear and disappear
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'visible' });
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'hidden' });
// OR wait until "Loading..." text disappears
await expect(page.locator('text=Loading...')).toHaveCount(0);
Notes:
Avoid this in all cases:
await page.waitForTimeout(3000); // hard-coded, fragile
Do this instead:
Use expect(locator).toContainText(...) for data presence.
Use .count() tracking to wait for table updates.
Use .waitFor({ state: 'visible' | 'hidden' }) on spinners/loaders.
You should avoid hard-coded waits like waitForTimeout(3000), because they make tests brittle and slow. Instead, you should wait for a concrete signal that the table has updated, using Playwright's locator-based assertions or visibility/state checks.
Root-Cause Solution: Wait for a Reliable Change in the Table
Assuming that after submitting the form, the admin user appears as a new row in the table, here’s how you should structure your code:
Option 1: Wait for a specific row/text to appear in the table:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for the user row to appear (use unique identifier like email/username)
await expect(page.locator('table')).toContainText('[email protected]');
Option 2: Wait for the number of rows to increase (if table rows are stable)
Before submitting:
const rowsBefore = await page.locator('table tbody tr').count();
After submitting:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for one more row to appear
await expect
.poll(async () => await page.locator('table tbody tr').count())
.toBe(rowsBefore + 1);
Option 3: Wait for a table loader/spinner to disappear (if applicable)
If the table shows a loading spinner or "Loading..." message during the refresh:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for spinner to appear and disappear
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'visible' });
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'hidden' });
// OR wait until "Loading..." text disappears
await expect(page.locator('text=Loading...')).toHaveCount(0);
Summary:
Don’t rely on fixed timeouts. Instead, wait for meaningful UI changes — like the presence of user info, row count increase, or a loading indicator disappearing.
You should avoid hard-coded waits like waitForTimeout(3000), because they make tests brittle and slow. Instead, you should wait for a concrete signal that the table has updated, using Playwright's locator-based assertions or visibility/state checks.
Root-Cause Solution: Wait for a Reliable Change in the Table
Assuming that after submitting the form, the admin user appears as a new row in the table, here’s how you should structure your code:
Option 1: Wait for a specific row/text to appear in the table:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for the user row to appear (use unique identifier like email/username)
await expect(page.locator('table')).toContainText('[email protected]');
Option 2: Wait for the number of rows to increase (if table rows are stable)
Before submitting:
const rowsBefore = await page.locator('table tbody tr').count();
After submitting:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for one more row to appear
await expect
.poll(async () => await page.locator('table tbody tr').count())
.toBe(rowsBefore + 1);
Option 3: Wait for a table loader/spinner to disappear (if applicable)
If the table shows a loading spinner or "Loading..." message during the refresh:
await page.locator('button[type="submit"]').click();
// Wait for spinner to appear and disappear
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'visible' });
await page.locator('.spinner').waitFor({ state: 'hidden' });
// OR wait until "Loading..." text disappears
await expect(page.locator('text=Loading...')).toHaveCount(0);
Notes:
Avoid this in all cases:
await page.waitForTimeout(3000); // hard-coded, fragile
Do this instead:
Use expect(locator).toContainText(...) for data presence.
Use .count() tracking to wait for table updates.
Use .waitFor({ state: 'visible' | 'hidden' }) on spinners/loaders.