You are not logged in. Your edit will be placed in a queue until it is peer reviewed.
We welcome edits that make the post easier to understand and more valuable for readers. Because community members review edits, please try to make the post substantially better than how you found it, for example, by fixing grammar or adding additional resources and hyperlinks.
-
2Though this is rather inelegant, it is very readable. Thank you.dotancohen– dotancohen2016年08月21日 06:28:49 +00:00Commented Aug 21, 2016 at 6:28
-
1+1 for unicode handling... @dotancohen IMNSHO "readable" implies "practical" which adds to "elegant", so i'd say "a bit inelegant"qneill– qneill2016年10月01日 00:00:30 +00:00Commented Oct 1, 2016 at 0:00
-
notional -1 for calling non-ascii characters "trash"axolotl– axolotl2022年02月10日 21:30:03 +00:00Commented Feb 10, 2022 at 21:30
-
@axolotl I meant no offense. If I recall correctly when I was writing it I was indeed dealing with very weird characters that are not from any alphabet.parsecer– parsecer2022年02月10日 23:01:13 +00:00Commented Feb 10, 2022 at 23:01
-
1I know :) it's a light hearted commentaxolotl– axolotl2022年02月10日 23:02:22 +00:00Commented Feb 10, 2022 at 23:02
lang-py