Skip to main content
Stack Overflow
  1. About
  2. For Teams

Timeline for C-like structures in Python

Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0

43 events
when toggle format what by license comment
Dec 19, 2024 at 1:52 comment added shea pretty official answer in the Python Tutorial, mirroring answers below
Sep 22, 2023 at 22:56 answer added Gabriel Staples timeline score: 0
Feb 15, 2023 at 10:20 answer added ntg timeline score: 0
Dec 25, 2022 at 18:52 answer added Mike 'Pomax' Kamermans timeline score: 1
Aug 27, 2021 at 9:04 comment added intellimath If one were concerned about performance and memory, then recordclass library can provide suitable solution to the problem.
Dec 9, 2020 at 9:08 comment added Basj If you're concerned about performance (RAM/CPU), then nothing beats a genuine tuple.
Jun 5, 2020 at 10:05 answer added Carson timeline score: 4
May 7, 2020 at 14:23 answer added Tioneb timeline score: 1
Sep 26, 2019 at 13:56 answer added calandoa timeline score: 4
Apr 9, 2019 at 11:10 answer added jochen timeline score: 5
Jan 28, 2019 at 11:27 answer added gebbissimo timeline score: 1
Dec 11, 2018 at 9:34 answer added שמואל ביאליסטוקי timeline score: 2
Dec 2, 2018 at 1:19 comment added Gabriel Staples Your question itself has the right answer to "C-like structures in Python", or "How to create a struct in Python." After reviewing all of the answers below, I'd say that using a class like you've done is the best way to do it. Using a dictionary is an alternative, and perhaps the second best way to do it.
May 31, 2018 at 18:37 history protected eyllanesc
May 13, 2018 at 0:13 comment added Navin Skip to the 2018 answer: stackoverflow.com/a/45426493/703382
Apr 12, 2018 at 6:17 answer added Oamar Kanji timeline score: 32
Mar 29, 2018 at 16:25 answer added PS1 timeline score: 2
Nov 6, 2017 at 15:38 answer added normanius timeline score: 3
Oct 30, 2017 at 13:40 answer added Galaxy timeline score: 2
Aug 5, 2017 at 0:39 answer added simsosims timeline score: 11
Jul 31, 2017 at 22:54 answer added Rotareti timeline score: 624
Jul 8, 2017 at 19:17 answer added Yujun Li timeline score: 0
Nov 8, 2016 at 14:06 answer added Jason C timeline score: 8
Sep 8, 2015 at 2:38 answer added ArtOfWarfare timeline score: 5
Jun 25, 2015 at 23:50 answer added Ella Rose timeline score: 25
Mar 23, 2015 at 14:32 answer added user124757 timeline score: 6
Mar 5, 2015 at 1:43 comment added Mark Horvath pandas.Series(a=42).a should do it if your a data-scientist...
Jan 26, 2015 at 19:44 comment added bx2 well namedtuple generates a class, so what exactly is the difference?
Nov 9, 2014 at 7:37 answer added Sujal Sheth timeline score: 9
Sep 20, 2014 at 13:45 history edited Ben McCormick CC BY-SA 3.0
added colon to function def
Sep 2, 2014 at 22:05 comment added sam boosalis @levesque harder to re-factor without typos, harder to read at a glance while skimming code, than MyStruct = namedtuple("MyStruct", "field1 field2 field3")
Aug 20, 2014 at 20:58 comment added Kyle Wild You may find dstruct useful: github.com/dorkitude/dstruct
Sep 13, 2013 at 17:40 answer added Phlip timeline score: 13
May 23, 2013 at 19:37 history edited glglgl CC BY-SA 3.0
removed that stuff which proved untrue according to a deleted answer
Sep 21, 2010 at 15:15 answer added Jose M Balaguer timeline score: 88
Sep 14, 2010 at 21:32 comment added levesque Is there anything wrong with this method other than it's tedious to write?
Sep 6, 2010 at 3:03 comment added Edward Z. Yang Semi-relatedly, algebraic data types would be absolutely wonderful, but to use them well you usually need pattern matching.
Aug 30, 2008 at 15:53 answer added PabloG timeline score: 19
Aug 30, 2008 at 15:20 answer added Vicent Marti timeline score: 28
Aug 30, 2008 at 15:18 answer added gz. timeline score: 388
Aug 30, 2008 at 14:38 answer added dF. timeline score: 108
Aug 30, 2008 at 14:35 answer added Mark Biek timeline score: 73
Aug 30, 2008 at 14:33 history asked wesc CC BY-SA 2.5
toggle format

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /