Timeline for Loopin' multiplication in Python?
Current License: CC BY-SA 3.0
20 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:58 | answer | added | shad0w_wa1k3r | timeline score: 0 | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:43 | vote | accept | Discovery | ||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:30 | vote | accept | Discovery | ||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:43 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:28 | comment | added | Discovery | Of course you didn't! Obviously this isn't a question and annoyment forum. You even took the time to look at this page - thanks! | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:23 | comment | added | SethMMorton | That's fine... I personally was not offended or moved to downvote. You asked why you were downvoted and I took a guess as to why. | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:22 | comment | added | Discovery | @SethMMorton: I tried different ways though they did not work and I thought that two loops would be better (this is not a lie). | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:19 | comment | added | SethMMorton | I didn't downvote, but it might be the statement "I had no idea what to do, so I tried with two loops." Many people on this site expect a minimal level of understanding of the problem. That makes it sound like instead of thinking critically of the problem, you were just throwing things at it, not sure what would happen. | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:16 | review | First posts | |||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:18 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:14 | vote | accept | Discovery | ||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:25 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:14 | comment | added | Discovery | Why has it been downvoted? | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:04 | answer | added | inspectorG4dget | timeline score: 1 | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:03 | answer | added | dm03514 | timeline score: 2 | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:03 | comment | added | Pandu |
Change the 1001 to a smaller number like 5 and you'll probably see what's wrong with your code.
|
|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:03 | comment | added | Ry-♦ |
You’re doing the factorial of 1–1000 times 1001^1000. That’s kind of fun. Anyways, it looks like it should be firstnumber * multiplication, not number * multiplication.
|
|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:03 | comment | added | Discovery | @dm03514: If there shouldn't be, please improve it and answer my question. Thanks! | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:02 | comment | added | alko | developers.google.com/edu/python | |
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:01 | comment | added | dm03514 | why are there two loops? | |
| S Nov 2, 2013 at 20:00 | history | suggested | Turbo | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added images
|
| Nov 2, 2013 at 20:00 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Nov 2, 2013 at 20:00 | |||||
| Nov 2, 2013 at 19:59 | history | asked | Discovery | CC BY-SA 3.0 |