Timeline for When to use virtual destructors?
Current License: CC BY-SA 4.0
21 events
| when toggle format | what | by | license | comment | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jan 9, 2022 at 7:47 | comment | added | xyf | the first example that has no virtual destructor in the base UB no? | |
| S May 1, 2020 at 17:06 | history | suggested | user12117801 | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
fixed an error
|
| May 1, 2020 at 14:36 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 1, 2020 at 17:06 | |||||
| Feb 26, 2020 at 10:39 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| Feb 26, 2020 at 12:03 | |||||
| S May 30, 2019 at 8:37 | history | suggested | Community Bot | CC BY-SA 4.0 |
corrected spelling and grammar
|
| May 30, 2019 at 8:14 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S May 30, 2019 at 8:37 | |||||
| S Mar 31, 2018 at 9:50 | history | suggested | Daniel Carvalho | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Fix non-functional code example due to typo
|
| Mar 31, 2018 at 8:41 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Mar 31, 2018 at 9:50 | |||||
| Nov 11, 2017 at 12:01 | comment | added | Tunvir Rahman Tusher | @rimiro Its automatic by c++.you can follow the link stackoverflow.com/questions/677620/… | |
| Nov 11, 2017 at 8:49 | comment | added | rooni | @TunvirRahmanTusher could you please explain why the Base Destructor is called?? | |
| Aug 20, 2017 at 14:56 | history | edited | Donald Duck is with Ukraine | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
added 142 characters in body
|
| Oct 3, 2013 at 12:58 | comment | added | cape1232 | @cmeub, But there is an idiom to achieve what you would want from a virtual constructor. See parashift.com/c++-faq-lite/virtual-ctors.html | |
| Jun 4, 2013 at 13:10 | history | edited | Tunvir Rahman Tusher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
deleted 30 characters in body
|
| Apr 21, 2013 at 20:09 | comment | added | cmeub | @Murkantilism, "virtual constructors cannot be done" is true indeed. A constructor cannot be marked virtual. | |
| Apr 19, 2013 at 6:50 | comment | added | Tunvir Rahman Tusher | " virtual constructor is not possible" means you need not write virtual constructor by your own. Construction of derived object must follow the chain of construction from derived to base. So you need not write the virtual keyword for your constructor. Thanks | |
| S Apr 11, 2013 at 11:32 | history | suggested | gda2004 | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
removed the word not
|
| Apr 11, 2013 at 11:23 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 11, 2013 at 11:32 | |||||
| S Apr 9, 2013 at 20:02 | history | suggested | Community Bot | CC BY-SA 3.0 |
Correct derived ctor to eliminate ambiguity - it seems like derived destructor is called twice.
|
| Apr 9, 2013 at 19:58 | review | Suggested edits | |||
| S Apr 9, 2013 at 20:02 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2013 at 13:57 | review | Late answers | |||
| Apr 9, 2013 at 14:03 | |||||
| Apr 9, 2013 at 13:39 | history | answered | Tunvir Rahman Tusher | CC BY-SA 3.0 |