__builtin_thread_pointer

Thu Feb 13 20:29:24 GMT 2025

On 2/12/2025 12:42 PM, ASSI via Cygwin wrote:
> Ken Brown via Cygwin writes:
>> On 2/11/2025 4:03 PM, Corinna Vinschen via Cygwin wrote:
>>> Ken, check the source or configury of your package. It looks weird that
>>> this function should be called architecture-independently.
>> Thanks for the suggestion. It's actually not called
>> architecture-independently, but the code was convoluted and I didn't
>> see at first what was going on. It turns out that I just had to add
>> "#if !defined(__CYGWIN__)" at the right place and the build succeeded.
>> It still seems wierd and brittle to hinge this decision on a platform
> macro rather than a test result from configury.

I agree, and I already sent that opinion upstream. No answer so far.
Ken