On 4/7/20 12:57 AM, Yaakov Selkowitz wrote: > On Mon, 2020年04月06日 at 23:55 +0000, JonY via Cygwin wrote: >> On 4/6/20 10:07 AM, Jan Nijtmans via Cygwin wrote: >>> Ping. >>>>>> Would it be possible to release a version of mingw64-i686-binutils with the >>> same patch as done for binutils-2.34+1git.de9c1b7cfe-1? I suspect >>> this would resolve the problem described here. >>>> Can you please report this issue to the binutils mailing list? I am >> unfamiliar with the binutils internals to know what exactly went wrong. >> JonY, >> I think the relevant differences after 2.34 were PR24511 and PR25447, > which are already fixed upstream: >> https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=40bfb9762747f8336b17c70a0173d10200fa62eb > https://sourceware.org/git/?p=binutils-gdb.git;a=commitdiff;h=82f439d028c65663a0baf0a17ef5c4a2ea5c84a7 >> Adding those as patches to 2.34 should fix the issue without having to > resort to a git snapshot. > OK, I'll see about using those 2 patches over the weekends. -------------- next part -------------- A non-text attachment was scrubbed... Name: signature.asc Type: application/pgp-signature Size: 833 bytes Desc: OpenPGP digital signature URL: <https://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20200407/ba7046f8/attachment.sig>