On 6/27/2016 11:12 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> Hmm, I'm undecided if this should be fixed in ruby or if we need a > Cygwin 2.5.3 reverting this patch... > In my opinion the patch should remain; a library doesn't have to be named with extension .dll. That is just the default. It could just as easily be named with .so as the extension. -- cyg Simple -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple