How about a 64-bit installer that doesn't require UAC?

Mon Nov 4 16:11:00 GMT 2013

On Nov 4 10:59, Christopher Faylor wrote:
> On Mon, Nov 04, 2013 at 12:53:43PM +0100, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
> >On Nov 3 14:13, Bill Welch wrote:
> >> My apologies for the snark. The list archive ends at the same
> >> message as the top of the second page of the nabble rendering and I
> >> didn't immediately see the additional messages in nabble that
> >> include a workaround.
> >
> >Setup should work for admins in the first place, without having to
> >remember explicit elevating every time. To fix this for the 64 bit
> >version, the best solution is not just to remove the "require admin"
> >manifest. Instead, there's a patch in the loop which allows setup to
> >elevate itself. It's just not ready for prime time yet.
>> So, probably the Thursday after next, cat-dependent?

If Shaddy is a cat person, yes.
Corinna
-- 
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Maintainer cygwin AT cygwin DOT com
Red Hat
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 836 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://cygwin.com/pipermail/cygwin/attachments/20131104/65430300/attachment.sig>