On 2/2/2011 9:35 AM, Corinna Vinschen wrote: >> If only the one's who decided that wchar_t in Cygwin should have the > same size as WCHAR_T in the underlying Windows would have thought twice > about the implications... Cygwin 1.9? Or maybe 2.0, if it breaks ABIs? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple