On Jul 10 10:37, Robert Klemme wrote: > All, >> I just notice that there is dash in cygwin 1.7 but there is also ash. > What would be the reason to switch from ash to dash? From what I am > finding on the web it seems, dash was basically ash code modernized. > So it seems when on 1.7 dash would be the preferred one. Any insight? I think dash is preferred in future. In theory we should dash hardlink to ash and deprecate the ash package entirely. It's about time. Eric? Corinna -- Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to Cygwin Project Co-Leader cygwin AT cygwin DOT com Red Hat -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple