> No, you have not done adequate testing obviously. >> I know what I'm doing and I tested 1.39 and it DOES NOT WORK with > cygwin gcc-4, you have to compile gcc yourself if you want it to work. >> Stop giving wrong information to people, you are wasting others' time. > I see that you've said exactly the same thing to somebody else who > couldn't get it to work. Dude. Sorry things aren't working out as you'd like, but a nasty tone like that just closed off any possibility of anyone here helping you. I think your only two options now are to apologize or leave. > PS: CC to me I am not subscribed to this list Right! What else? -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple