Eric Blake wrote: >> That's a workaround, not a solution. Any VCS that requires an O(n) (n as > the number of files being labeled) labeling post-processing pass in order > to create enough records in the database to track commits atomically, when > there are O(1) solutions like git where commits are atomic _without any > additional effort), is just too slow to be worth anything in my opinion. >Renaming a label type is an O(0) operation. It doesn't depend on the number of labels of that type applied. Eric Blake wrote: >> Besides, git is open source, clearcase is not. >That's a different issue. I very much agree on the advantages of free software. But you are still comparing a free horse to a commercial plane. And, there is some freedom bound to the fact the latter flies. Marc -- View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Looking-for-the-%27stdout%27-of-a-Windows-application-tp26769438p26779905.html Sent from the Cygwin list mailing list archive at Nabble.com. -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple