"Michael Kairys" <kairys@comcast.net> wrote: > > (3) http://www.f-prot.com >> Thanks for the suggestion... Seems some reviews give them low marks on > detection rates: > http://www.virusbtn.com/vb100/RAP/RAP-quadrant-Feb-Aug09.jpg > http://www.virus-centre.com/ >> ... and some low marks on features (19 out of 20): > http://anti-virus-software-review.toptenreviews.com/index2.html Very interesting, thank you! I can well live with the limited features, but if the low detection rate comes true it would indeed worry me. I also had a look into http://www.av-comparatives.org/ but unfortunately they did not test f-prot. Regards -- Wilfried Hennings -- Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/ Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
