On Fri, Jul 14, 2006 at 12:16:12PM +0200, Angelo Graziosi wrote: >Corinna Vinschen wrote: >>> Well, Monday. Isn't that explicit enough? Do you also need the year? >>>The original post (http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00188.html) was >dated 20060707. >>Perhaps it would be sufficient a 1.5.20-2 that fix this >http://cygwin.com/ml/cygwin/2006-07/msg00145.html. Or, maybe you could just assume that if cygwin wasn't released there might be a reason? Did you see any actual testing of the snapshot, for instance? cgf -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/