"have you looked into rebaseall?"

Fri Feb 17 19:34:00 GMT 2006

On 17 February 2006 19:21, Brian Dessent wrote:
> Dave Korn wrote:
>>> Absolutely so. I reckon doing a proper rebaseall that includes the
>> oracle dlls should make a noticeable difference.
>> This is important. The rebaseall script only knows about DLLs installed
> via setup.exe. So, you will need to provide a list of any additional
> DLLs that you want rebased, with the -T argument.

 Sorry for not being clearer, yes, that's exactly what I meant by 'proper'
and 'includes the oracle dlls', but I didn't go lookup the exact syntax. 
> I haven't been following this thread all that closely, but are we
> talking about allocating a single large contiguous memory region?

 Say, Brian, you are ponderin' what we've been ponderin'! ;-)
> Because if you try to allocate it all at once then the DLL layout will
> matter, but if it's done as a series of smaller allocations then this
> should be irrelevant.

 Yep, it's the old huge-contiguous-allocation problem again.
 cheers,
 DaveK
-- 
Can't think of a witty .sigline today....
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/