On Sun, Feb 12, 2006 at 11:57:00AM -0500, Christopher Faylor wrote: > If we don't get a single person indicating that they rely on the current > behavior then I'm ok with changing it. We have a patch ready to be > checked in, in fact. I assume that: $ PATH="/foo::$PATH" cmd /c printenv PATH will continue to show /foo:./:yaddayadda with the patch? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/