change in behavior of make from 3.80 to 3.81

Wed Aug 16 20:35:00 GMT 2006

At 03:47 PM 8/16/2006, Christopher Faylor wrote:
>The suggestion was that a patch be submitted upstream. I agree with the
>suggestion and have amplified on it a little in another message.
>>This suggestion does not require further input from me. If I was interested
>in being involved in coming up with a patch, I'd have already done so.
>>I'm not interested in playing any further games of catch-up with you or
>anyone else. Please don't try to involve me in your attempts to modify
>the upstream make. However, should you actually come up with a patch, I
>will monitor the make mailing list and, if I have any objections, I'll
>make them there.

Without your support, I don't think the patch would get far.
I am thinking the patch would be something like:
#ifdef CYGWIN
#define HAVE_DOS_PATHS 
#endif
-Bill
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/