James Van Buskirk wrote: > <beliavsky@aol.com> wrote in message > news:3064b51d.0411010345.4b5ad81b@posting.google.com... >>>>that does not require Cygwin to be preinstalled -- the necessary >>Cygwin dll is included. After it has been tested I think it will be >>posted to the g95 site. >>> OK, this looks interesting. If it makes it to the g95 site let us > know. >Wouldn't that violate the cygwin license, unless all required sources for both g95 and cygwin were posted to the site which includes cygwin dll? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/