Oh dear, pthreads and stdio still not mt-safe :-(
Dave Korn
dk@artimi.com
Wed Jan 7 19:28:00 GMT 2004
> -----Original Message-----
> From: cygwin-owner@cygwin.com
> [mailto:cygwin-owner@cygwin.com] On Behalf Of Christopher Faylor
>> We are missing a pthreads maintainer at the moment so it
> isn't likely that this will be fixed anytime soon.
>> FYI,
> cgf
Ah, thanks for the info. I noticed that a few people have been working on
it lately, including yourself and Thomas Pfaff, so I was hoping that any
known problems or workrounds might be fresh in people's minds. May I ask if
whoever last was maintainer left any notes or docs about problems/work
needed? Anything with clues in it might help.
Meanwhile I've just tried a new variant of my testcase using the win32
thread functions instead of pthread_create and pthread_join, and the
problems remain; so I think this must be a stdio bug rather than a pthread
bug. I've gotta leave for home now, but I'll send in the new test with the
win32-based threads tomorrow if anyone's interested.
Finally, because that last post was rather long, and nobody might have
noticed a one-liner right in the middle, I'll just repeat this last
question:
Shouldn't rand_r be exported in cygwin.din? It doesn't seem to be ATM.
cheers all,
DaveK
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list