[ANNOUNCEMENT] Release candidate: gcc-3.4.1-1

Wed Aug 25 18:48:00 GMT 2004

Gerrit P. Haase wrote:
> > Is this true? I have 3.3.1 libraries in /lib and
> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/3.3.1, but 2.95 libraries only in
> > /lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10.
>> There was no libjava with 2.x compilers. There was no libobjc with 2.x
> compilers. What about libstdc++?

As I said, 2.95 holds all its libraries, including libstdc++, in
/lib/gcc-lib/i686-pc-cygwin/2.95.3-10.
> > When 3.4 becomes default and
> > official, could you release a 3.3 build with libraries moved
completely to
> > /lib/gcc-lib ?
>> Hmmm, I don't like maintaining two versions of a package, if 3.4 is
> stable it will be the one and only current version.

I'm aware of it and that's why I'm asking. That would be the final release
of 3.3, able to coexist with 3.4. Then you could happily forget about 3.3.
This would make no sense if 3.4 is binary compatible with 3.3. Are
differences between 3.3 and 3.4 significant?
Regards
Krzysztof Duleba
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/