cygserver shmat

Thu Aug 12 10:46:00 GMT 2004

On Aug 12 12:13, bertrand marquis wrote:
> In fact i wasn't using the SHM_RNd flag.
>> In details here is what i do:
>> - get a shared segment of with size= SIZE (SIZE multiple of SHMLBA)
> - attach the segment without specifying address and storing the result
> in beginaddress
> - attach the segment again specifying the address: endposition=
> beginaddress + SIZE
>> without SHM_RND in the second shmat i've got the error : invalid
> argument
>> now that i specifie SHM_RND in the flag i have the error: value to large
> for defined type ....
>> any idea ?

Nope. Not without knowing the actual values. An strace output of
the affected calls would be good. Even better, create a simple testcase
which allows to reproduce the behaviour. Just the minimum of necessary
code.
Corinna
-- 
Corinna Vinschen Please, send mails regarding Cygwin to
Cygwin Co-Project Leader mailto:cygwin@cygwin.com
Red Hat, Inc.
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/