"Hans Horn" wrote in message news:c5h1k7$cl$1@sea.gmane.org... > Quite interesting indeed! >> Are there other benchmarks around that compare gcc3.x, gcc3.x (cygwin), etc > against the gcc2.9x vintage? See "C/C++ Program Perfometer : Tool for measuring comparative performance of the C/C++ code " http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=bm9216%24jvo98%241%40ID-79865.news.uni-berlin.de >> H. > "chris" <caj@cs.york.ac.uk> wrote in message > news:407C0198.4000707@cs.york.ac.uk... > > Alex Vinokur wrote: > > > > > ======================================== > > > Comparative Performance of C++ Compilers > > > C/C++ Performance Tests > > > ========================================= > > > [snip] -- Alex Vinokur mailto:alexvn@connect.to http://mathforum.org/library/view/10978.html -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/