> >> Who's the sh-utils guru here? :-) cgf> That could be you! It's free software, remember? Cute, very cute, Chris, and yes, we know full well that this is a (mostly) all-volunteer effort as far as fixing nits, but that was a very non-responsive and unproductive reply, and it would be more helpful if you could tell us who deals with bumping versions in code inherited from gnu.org. (I.E., sh-utils in general and uname in particular.) At least, can any of you -RCM's tell us who's the most familiar with configuration-management issues in that part of the tree? -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/