cygipc (and PostgreSQL) XP problem resolved!

Fri May 9 03:41:00 GMT 2003

Jason Tishler wrote:
> Chuck,
>> On Wed, May 07, 2003 at 08:31:07PM -0400, Charles Wilson wrote:
>>>I think this needs to be a runtime function, not a compiletime macro.
>>> Given Igor's validation, improvements, and corrections of/to my patch,
> do you still want a runtime function approach? Or, is the (ugly and
> possibly performance affecting) macro approach OK?

Nope -- I'm an idiot. You and Igor are correct. But I'm more concerned 
about the other issues I raised, to which nobody has yet responded 
(although I'm still working thru the mail). To whit: 64 bit key_t and 
coordination with cygwin dll/newlib.
--Chuck
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/