> Agreed. Perhaps the naming should be a bit more evident. > I don't reread the list purpose everytime I do a post. Cygwin-packaging or cygwin-app-packag[e/ing] would be a bit more self- > documenting. Nothing more intelligent that a self documenting > name. :-) > -linda Maybe. But that document (<http://cygwin.com/lists.html>) is there for a reason, that being list descriptions and perhaps rules. Remebering that setup bugs and package maintainer chit-chat goto cygwin-apps@cygwin.com , bugs in apache, bash or pdksh :-) and the rest of all things Cygwin goto cygwin@cygwin.com , and Cygwin DLL patches goto cygwin-patches@cygwin.com , shouldn't be too hard. I'm not saying this personally just a little post-it for subscribers mailboxes. ;-) Regards, Elfyn McBratney elfyn@exposure.org.uk www.exposure.org.uk -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Bug reporting: http://cygwin.com/bugs.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/