Why isn't ntsec a mount option? Max Bowsher wrote: >Having ntsec on by default has shown us that the imperfect mapping between >ACLs and file modes can cause a *lot* of problems. Essentially, for ntsec to >be useful, a fair amount of caring for permissions is required. New users >are often not prepared for this. Hence: what about making ntsc off by >default again? >>>If not, I guess the ntsec code needs to be spun off into a seperate library, >where setup can get at it too. >>-- Doug VanLeuven -- Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/