CVS permissions problem with network drive
Christopher Faylor
cgf@redhat.com
Tue Dec 19 09:28:00 GMT 2000
On Tue, Dec 19, 2000 at 11:47:25AM -0500, Charles S. Wilson wrote:
>Christopher Faylor wrote:
>>Actually, shouldn't this be a mount option rather than a cygwin
>>setting? In fact, maybe a
>>>>mount -n c:\foo /foo # use NTSEC semantics
>>>>would be sort of nice.
>>Yes, it would. But, how would
>>cp foo //bar/baz
>>be handled?
It would use the default or we could still use a CYGWIN environment
variable.
I just tried doing a 'mount //foo/bar //foo/bar' but that didn't work.
>Besides, this is something you'd configure one way or the other for all
>SMB shares -- either you're a domain user or you're not. So, it
>probably shouldn't be set on a per-share or per-mount basis, but rather
>it should be set globally for a particular user/installation.
Isn't it possible that you could have different shares mounted from
different systems with different requirements? That's why I was
suggesting a mount option.
cgf
--
Want to unsubscribe from this list?
Check out: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
More information about the Cygwin
mailing list