HEADS-UP: Modular X11 (ALL maintainers, please read)

Mon Apr 17 23:43:00 GMT 2006

James R. Phillips wrote:
> --- Igor Peshansky wrote:
>> Unless the set of X libraries is *really* small, it would make sense to
>> have a non-X version of ghostscript.
>> OK, we'll have to wait and see on that. Otherwise, I guess we have consensus
> in principle on a method to carry both versions forward.

I'm currently estimating 6 runtime libraries and 1 data package, to 
satisfy gs's dependency on libX11 and libXt. I doubt more than that 
will be necessary for basic usage, but we'll have to see.
Yaakov