This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
- From: Christopher Faylor <cgf-use-the-mailinglist-please at cygwin dot com>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: 2013年5月18日 13:01:44 -0400
- Subject: Re: BUG: Ability to access nonexistent directories
- References: <20130517083612 dot GE21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <000d01ce52dc74ドルe54bb05ドルeafe310$%fedin at samsung dot com> <20130517102655 dot GG21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130517145612 dot GC7087 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130517152206 dot GL21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <20130517174857 dot GB660 at ednor dot casa dot cgf dot cx> <20130517180022 dot GQ21752 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <5196B2F8 dot 6090902 at etr-usa dot com> <20130518082809 dot GB2406 at calimero dot vinschen dot de> <2ab36a85d8004fdb8bbb627e8d69721f at BY2PR03MB090 dot namprd03 dot prod dot outlook dot com>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
On Sat, May 18, 2013 at 04:58:18PM +0000, Stephan Mueller wrote:
>" On May 17 16:45, Warren Young wrote:
>" > On 5/17/2013 12:00, Corinna Vinschen wrote:
>" > >
>" > >Is that ENOFEL or EFLOCK?
>" >
>" > It depends. ENOFEL is the BSD way, but POSIX standardized the SysV
>" > error constant, EFLOCK. Linux supports both, of course, so Cygwin
>" > should, too.
>"
>" Hmm. I'm not too keen to add an error message fome something which
>" could be fixed instead. Maybe we should consider to get us a cat
>" instead?
>
>So, you recommend re-installing the coreutils package, then?
I think we're now starting to litter this ml with indirect puns.
Perhaps we should paws to reflect if this is really wise.
cgf
--
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple