This is the mail archive of the
cygwin
mailing list for the Cygwin project.
Re: "have you looked into rebaseall?"
- From: Brian Dessent <brian at dessent dot net>
- To: cygwin at cygwin dot com
- Date: 2006年2月17日 11:21:07 -0800
- Subject: Re: "have you looked into rebaseall?"
- References: <016901c633f4902ドルf65e0$a501a8c0@CAM.ARTIMI.COM>
- Reply-to: cygwin at cygwin dot com
Dave Korn wrote:
> Absolutely so. I reckon doing a proper rebaseall that includes the oracle
> dlls should make a noticeable difference.
This is important. The rebaseall script only knows about DLLs installed
via setup.exe. So, you will need to provide a list of any additional
DLLs that you want rebased, with the -T argument.
I haven't been following this thread all that closely, but are we
talking about allocating a single large contiguous memory region?
Because if you try to allocate it all at once then the DLL layout will
matter, but if it's done as a series of smaller allocations then this
should be irrelevant.
Brian
--
Unsubscribe info: http://cygwin.com/ml/#unsubscribe-simple
Problem reports: http://cygwin.com/problems.html
Documentation: http://cygwin.com/docs.html
FAQ: http://cygwin.com/faq/