User Ratings
★★★★★
★★★★
★★★
★★
★
49
0
0
0
2
ease
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
3 / 5
features
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
4 / 5
design
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
3 / 5
support
1 of 5
2 of 5
3 of 5
4 of 5
5 of 5
4 / 5
Rate This Project
Login To Rate This Project
Featured Reviews
Highest Rated
It works. It supports pretty much everything you can think of. It doesn't crash in the hands of a casual user.
careersby
Lowest Rated
When we looked at a Wiki solution for an Intranet, this seemed the way to go. So we were quite surprised to find out all the limitations; for one thing that works, there seems to be another one that does not. Promising too much is the real culprit here I think. You should recenter and concentrate on making the core good enough, instead of putting an infinite number of questionable options. Having one standard template that looks GOOD on all modern browsers would be great too. The other problem is the lack of central design: each feature seems implemented by a martian from a different planet. It's a free thing, so no real complaints can be emitted, right...
arenaud01
User Reviews
-
bilalsiddiq Posted 2020年03月15日Tiki is my choice of platform to build quick web applications automating company processes, distribution of data/information, and management of team members.
-
montefuscolo Posted 2018年01月04日It is a great solution for teams and collaboration.
-
drsassafras Edited 2017年08月02日Tiki was on a small list of possible solutions for a website project that included collaborative translation of mixed media. It's performed remarkably well and exceeded most of my expectations and even imagination of what was posable. The community is active and helpful. I since deployed several websites with this software and have found its robust features an asset, even when I have not initially planned on using them.2 users found this review helpful.
-
jonnybradley Edited 2016年03月08日Although i'm somewhat biased because I chose to use Tiki for all my web site building a while ago and am now a developer and regular contributor. That's because I believe there's nothing like it as a wiki CMS web application in terms of features, plus the community is great!2 users found this review helpful.
-
alexuo Edited 2015年11月03日Clumsy untidy visual appearance, tooltips crawl over screen borders; skins are eye-gouging or hardly legible (e.g. hard to see links in a text). Trying to set a homepage to "forum" gives users an error message like "forum not chosen" or something; while there is no option to choose forum in the settings panel... Boasting that they have 2 major releases per year is rather a sign of degradation to me (Firefox became s*** soon after it started to have that fever of releases)... So I wonder how is that a mature software - looks like an amateur fiddling... Besides, it requires absolutely separate MySQL DB only for itself, which can be a PITA in some shared web-hostings (nowadays even as complex CMS as Joomla allow to share their DB, through prefixes)... Thus I tried it briefly, and found many bugs or inconveniences in a few minutes... Disappointed. Not a proper engine if you want a nice, professionally looking site, IMHO.1 user found this review helpful.
-
evliempt Posted 2014年11月24日After hours of research a year ago, I could only come to one conclusion in my opinion: to get the best wiki-system with cms funcionality and good permission management for restricted areas and more integrated functionality (and which can handle multiple languages) and is open source; I find out there was one good solution; TIKI WIKI. Now, after some years of use, I can say this was the right choice! I works fine!3 users found this review helpful.
-
amirchrist Posted 2014年03月13日so amazing!
-
jarvismorris Posted 2013年05月27日This is great. My son loves it. Thank you for your work guys!1 user found this review helpful.
-
skinut Posted 2013年04月28日Tiki is an all around great piece of software. It effectively covers about any type of activity one could expect to tackle on the Internet today. Of course no software package can be all things to all people, the few the package doesn't quite satisfy are covered by incredible accessibility. By "accessibility" I mean both of the software that is well structured and highly modifiable and also the software team itself which I have found to be amazingly open to providing assistance and taking suggestions alike.1 user found this review helpful.
-
careersby Posted 2013年04月07日It works. It supports pretty much everything you can think of. It doesn't crash in the hands of a casual user.5 users found this review helpful.
-
sumonakhan Posted 2013年01月23日i always use this. Its too good.
-
a11922256 Posted 2012年12月18日Good and useful software
-
concr Posted 2012年10月27日That's a super awesome project!
-
enwilliams332 Posted 2012年10月23日it dosnt crash.. one of my favorite Open Source Web App
-
cairaprox Posted 2012年09月17日I love its features as well as the possibility of a forum.
-
surehybreter Posted 2012年08月11日Just awesome. No more words needed.
-
petertao87 Posted 2012年08月02日Thanks, like it a lot.
-
atpatnighsel Posted 2012年06月13日Awesome. Keep up the good work.
-
trancahasand Posted 2012年06月06日Outstanding utility.
-
inizalca Posted 2012年06月05日Just grea
-
pautiofidog Posted 2012年06月04日Fast, Functional, Simple and Efficient.
-
aqitcales Posted 2012年06月02日Not perfect, but very good and dispo in 64bits for Windows.
-
anfibtemum Posted 2012年06月02日I recommend this program strongly!
-
mautomoda Posted 2012年06月02日Great project! Very useful!
-
bennycrossman Posted 2012年06月01日Really powerful and practical software.