I've solved the problem, but not in the most creative way... I junked the installation, which was 1.2.2, and reinstalled from scratch with 1.3.3. It took ten minutes, tops, and everything's fine now. (Thank you, John Kershaw and Joby Walker, for your help!) Robert Orenstein Perforce Software "The world is quiet here"
Good. 1.3.3 is very stable. The biggest thing that got me was the difference between the original markup and markup 2.0. jbw Robert Orenstein wrote: > I've solved the problem, but not in the most creative way... I junked > the installation, which was 1.2.2, and reinstalled from scratch with 1.3.3. > It took ten minutes, tops, and everything's fine now. > > (Thank you, John Kershaw and Joby Walker, for your help!) > > Robert Orenstein > Perforce Software > > "The world is quiet here" > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > This sf.net email is sponsored by: Dice - The leading online job board > for high-tech professionals. Search and apply for tech jobs today! > http://seeker.dice.com/seeker.epl?rel_code=31 > _______________________________________________ > Phpwiki-talk mailing list > Php...@li... > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/phpwiki-talk
>Good. 1.3.3 is very stable. > >The biggest thing that got me was the difference between the >original markup and markup 2.0. Can you still use the original markup? I had a feeling you couldn't (or it got converted 'for you'), which is the main reason all my sites are 1.3.2 (that and I couldn't figure out the templating). John -- ------------------------------------ 0113 2289316 / 07944 755613 jo...@ke... / www.kershaw.org AOL johnkershaw / Y! john_m_kershaw ------------------------------------
On 2002年7月29日 18:19:42 +0100 John Kershaw <jo...@ke...> wrote: > >Good. 1.3.3 is very stable. > > > >The biggest thing that got me was the difference between the > >original markup and markup 2.0. > > Can you still use the original markup? I had a feeling you couldn't > (or it got converted 'for you'), which is the main reason all my > sites are 1.3.2 (that and I couldn't figure out the templating). Yes. There's a checkbox on the edit form which lets you specify which markup style each page should use. New pages default to the new markup style. Of course it would only take a minor amount of hackage to change that. If you only want to allow old markup, that would be a straightforward hack as well... I don't think there are any facilities for automatic conversion of old- to new-markup as yet. Though it's been awhile since I've looked at the code, so I could be wrong.
Jeff Dairiki wrote: > On 2002年7月29日 18:19:42 +0100 > John Kershaw <jo...@ke...> wrote: > > >>Can you still use the original markup? I had a feeling you couldn't >>(or it got converted 'for you'), which is the main reason all my >>sites are 1.3.2 (that and I couldn't figure out the templating). > > > Yes. There's a checkbox on the edit form which lets you specify > which markup style each page should use. > > New pages default to the new markup style. Of course it would only > take a minor amount of hackage to change that. If you only want > to allow old markup, that would be a straightforward hack as well... > > I don't think there are any facilities for automatic conversion > of old- to new-markup as yet. Though it's been awhile since I've > looked at the code, so I could be wrong. > > Just to elaborate on Jeff's comments. The checkbox Jeff is referring to is on the edit page labeled "Use new markup", and I haven't seen any auto conversion stuff in the code... jbw