On 4/5/07, Bill Baxter <wb...@gm...> wrote: > So I suggest instead 'npy'. It is already used extensively in the C > API of Numpy so it has strong precedent as an abbreviation. It also > *looks* to me like an abbreviation for 'numpy' as opposed to "number > of points (np)" or something else. Having 3 letters also makes it > slightly less likely to clash with typical short user variable names. +1 for npy.