SourceForge logo
SourceForge logo
Menu

Re: [matplotlib-devel] v1.4.3rc1

From: Thomas C. <tca...@gm...> - 2015年02月09日 01:01:00
Sorry about the bad tarball, I forgot to clean my git directory before
generating it. Another point in favor of using the gh tarball, I can't
screw it up.
This is the first I have seen that CVE.
That PR is not included in 1.4.3 because it completely over-hauls how the
Agg rendering works (and generated a whole bunch of other bugs along the
way).
Mike: Is there a way to fix up the security issues reported on just the
1.4.x branch with out pulling that whole patch back?
Tom
On Sun Feb 08 2015 at 7:47:00 PM Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote:
> Please ignore my test failure report. I was accidentally running an older
> install of matplotlib from the same branch.
>
> Ben Root
>
> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:08 PM, Benjamin Root <ben...@ou...> wrote:
>
>> I am getting some test failures here and on master in the collections
>> module.
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> FAIL: __main__.test_regularpolycollection_rotate.test
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/home/ben/miniconda/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py",
>> line 197, in runTest
>> self.test(*self.arg)
>> File
>> "/home/ben/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib-1.4.x-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py",
>> line 51, in failer
>> result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File
>> "/home/ben/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib-1.4.x-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py",
>> line 196, in do_test
>> '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> /home/ben/Programs/matplotlib/result_images/test_collections/regularpolycollection_rotate.png
>> vs.
>> /home/ben/Programs/matplotlib/result_images/test_collections/regularpolycollection_rotate-expected.png
>> (RMS 54.618)
>>
>> ======================================================================
>> FAIL: __main__.test_regularpolycollection_scale.test
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Traceback (most recent call last):
>> File "/home/ben/miniconda/lib/python2.7/site-packages/nose/case.py",
>> line 197, in runTest
>> self.test(*self.arg)
>> File
>> "/home/ben/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib-1.4.x-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py",
>> line 51, in failer
>> result = f(*args, **kwargs)
>> File
>> "/home/ben/.local/lib/python2.7/site-packages/matplotlib-1.4.x-py2.7-linux-x86_64.egg/matplotlib/testing/decorators.py",
>> line 196, in do_test
>> '(RMS %(rms).3f)'%err)
>> ImageComparisonFailure: images not close:
>> /home/ben/Programs/matplotlib/result_images/test_collections/regularpolycollection_scale.png
>> vs.
>> /home/ben/Programs/matplotlib/result_images/test_collections/regularpolycollection_scale-expected.png
>> (RMS 120.828)
>>
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> Ran 54 tests in 15.149s
>>
>> FAILED (failures=2)
>>
>>
>>
>> The squares in the first test are larger than they should be. I have some
>> other errors, but they seem to other be floating point errors, or issues
>> with fonts.
>>
>> Ben Root
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 4:46 PM, Thomas Caswell <tca...@gm...>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Sandro,
>>>
>>> Well, creating the tarball on GH is a lot easier for us as it happens
>>> automatically! I don't want to unilaterally change policy so I will create
>>> the files on SF.
>>>
>>> If you want to tracking GH for debian instead of SF I don't think that
>>> would be a bad idea, but I don't know how much of a hassle that would be
>>> for you.
>>>
>>> Tom
>>>
>>> On Sat Feb 07 2015 at 4:14:36 PM Sandro Tosi <mo...@de...> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Sat, Feb 7, 2015 at 9:05 PM, Thomas Caswell <tca...@gm...>
>>>> wrote:
>>>> > Sandro,
>>>> >
>>>> > Can you use the tarball from github
>>>> > (https://github.com/matplotlib/matplotlib/archive/v1.4.3rc1.tar.gz ?)
>>>>
>>>> Sure I can, but since all the previous release (even RC) were done one
>>>> SF, we have our tools to monitor and download new releases pointing to
>>>> SF: do you plan to switch to GH for releasing tarballs too?
>>>>
>>>> Cheers,
>>>> --
>>>> Sandro Tosi (aka morph, morpheus, matrixhasu)
>>>> My website: http://matrixhasu.altervista.org/
>>>> Me at Debian: http://wiki.debian.org/SandroTosi
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> Dive into the World of Parallel Programming. The Go Parallel Website,
>>> sponsored by Intel and developed in partnership with Slashdot Media, is
>>> your
>>> hub for all things parallel software development, from weekly thought
>>> leadership blogs to news, videos, case studies, tutorials and more. Take
>>> a
>>> look and join the conversation now. http://goparallel.sourceforge.net/
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Matplotlib-devel mailing list
>>> Mat...@li...
>>> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/matplotlib-devel
>>>
>>>
>>
>

View entire thread

Want the latest updates on software, tech news, and AI?
Get latest updates about software, tech news, and AI from SourceForge directly in your inbox once a month.
Thanks for helping keep SourceForge clean.
X





Briefly describe the problem (required):
Upload screenshot of ad (required):
Select a file, or drag & drop file here.
Screenshot instructions:

Click URL instructions:
Right-click on the ad, choose "Copy Link", then paste here →
(This may not be possible with some types of ads)

More information about our ad policies

Ad destination/click URL:

AltStyle によって変換されたページ (->オリジナル) /