Darren Dale, on 2011年04月11日 13:24, wrote: > On Mon, Apr 11, 2011 at 12:13 PM, Michael Droettboom <md...@st...> wrote: > > I couldn't find the old thread about Sourceforge bug tracker vs. the > > Github issue tracker, but maybe we should reevaluate based on the new > > Github issue tracker announced on Saturday: > > > > https://github.com/blog/831-issues-2-0-the-next-generation > > > > The integration with git commits (closing issues by mentioning them in > > the commit message) is particularly compelling. > > The new issue tracker is a really big improvement over the old github > tracker, and I prefer it to the one at sourceforge since it integrates > so nicely with github version control. The github tracker is still > missing some features that we may want to consider: prioritize issues, > add attachments, and perhaps report issues without opening a github > account. I'm fine either way - though moving to GitHub certainly makes sense as it has momentum - whereas SF.net has been stagnating and not getting any faster for quite some time now. My only concern / request is that we transfer and/or clean up (wholesale) the sf.net bug tracker before we move to GH. It'd be a disservice to our users if we just ignored or mass-closed those issues in the transition to GH. best, -- Paul Ivanov 314 address only used for lists, off-list direct email at: http://pirsquared.org | GPG/PGP key id: 0x0F3E28F7