Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP coreASP.NET Core vs. .net framework.NET Framework can see a x7 speed increase. Task7 times speed increase for tasks such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: https://softwarehut.com/blog/tech/net-core-vs-net-framework-testing-performance .NET Core vs .NET Framework: Testing Performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc. all add up.
Key infoinformation from the above site:
.NET Core featured in all my tests much faster than the full .NET – sometimes 7 or even up to 13 times faster. Choosing the right CPU architecture can dramatically change the behaviour of your application, so the results gathered from one architecture can be invalid on the other and vice versa. For example – if your .NET Core application performs much SHA256 hashing computations, then the best option would be to use AMD Zen-based servers instead of Intel-based ones. So to sum up – if performance is a significant factor in your
Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP core vs .net framework can see x7 speed increase. Task such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: https://softwarehut.com/blog/tech/net-core-vs-net-framework-testing-performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc all add up.
Key info from above site:
.NET Core featured in all my tests much faster than the full .NET – sometimes 7 or even up to 13 times faster. Choosing the right CPU architecture can dramatically change the behaviour of your application, so the results gathered from one architecture can be invalid on the other and vice versa. For example – if your .NET Core application performs much SHA256 hashing computations, then the best option would be to use AMD Zen-based servers instead of Intel-based ones. So to sum up – if performance is a significant factor in your
Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP.NET Core vs. .NET Framework can see a 7 times speed increase for tasks such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: .NET Core vs .NET Framework: Testing Performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc. all add up.
Key information from the above site:
.NET Core featured in all my tests much faster than the full .NET – sometimes 7 or even up to 13 times faster. Choosing the right CPU architecture can dramatically change the behaviour of your application, so the results gathered from one architecture can be invalid on the other and vice versa. For example – if your .NET Core application performs much SHA256 hashing computations, then the best option would be to use AMD Zen-based servers instead of Intel-based ones. So to sum up – if performance is a significant factor in your
Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP core vs .net framework can see x7 speed increase. Task such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: https://softwarehut.com/blog/tech/net-core-vs-net-framework-testing-performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc all add up.
Key info from above site:
.NET Core featured in all my tests much faster than the full .NET – sometimes 7 or even up to 13 times faster. Choosing the right CPU architecture can dramatically change the behaviour of your application, so the results gathered from one architecture can be invalid on the other and vice versa. For example – if your .NET Core application performs much SHA256 hashing computations, then the best option would be to use AMD Zen-based servers instead of Intel-based ones. So to sum up – if performance is a significant factor in your
Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP core vs .net framework can see x7 speed increase. Task such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: https://softwarehut.com/blog/tech/net-core-vs-net-framework-testing-performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc all add up
Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP core vs .net framework can see x7 speed increase. Task such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: https://softwarehut.com/blog/tech/net-core-vs-net-framework-testing-performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc all add up.
Key info from above site:
.NET Core featured in all my tests much faster than the full .NET – sometimes 7 or even up to 13 times faster. Choosing the right CPU architecture can dramatically change the behaviour of your application, so the results gathered from one architecture can be invalid on the other and vice versa. For example – if your .NET Core application performs much SHA256 hashing computations, then the best option would be to use AMD Zen-based servers instead of Intel-based ones. So to sum up – if performance is a significant factor in your
Programming language / framework does matter.
Even within .NET. ASP core vs .net framework can see x7 speed increase. Task such as serialisation and deserialization and simple string validation such as StringStartsWith. See: https://softwarehut.com/blog/tech/net-core-vs-net-framework-testing-performance
Taking into account other languages, their specific overheads, compiled vs scripted, etc all add up