Talk:Stewards/Confirm/2022
Add topicConfirmation discussions will remain open from 28 February 2022, 17:30 (UTC) till 07 March 2022, 17:29 (UTC). This may be extended to two weeks for one or more confirmations at the discretion of the Election Committee if the committee believes further input is required before concluding. The Election Committee will close these discussions and implement the outcome (which also means making a decision in non-obvious cases).
This page is for steward discussion only. Please do not comment in this box unless you are a steward.
The summaries below provide a very strict overview of the most relevant confirmation comments.
Stewards: Please leave your comments right below the boxes after reviewing the actual confirmation comments and your understanding of relevant policies. You may summarize the confirmation discussions in individual comments, but no overall summary is given.
Status | Candidate | Notes |
---|---|---|
Confirmed
|
-revi | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
AmandaNP | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Base | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Bsadowski1 | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Cromium | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Defender | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
DerHexer | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
HakanIST | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Hoo man | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Jon Kolbert | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Linedwell | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
MarcGarver | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
MarcoAurelio | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Martin Urbanec | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Masti | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Matanya | clear consensus to confirm |
Resigned
|
Melos | Did not run for reconfirmation |
Confirmed
|
MusikAnimal | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Operator873 | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
RadiX | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Ruslik0 | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Sakretsu | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Schniggendiller | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Sotiale | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Stanglavine | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Stryn | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Tegel | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Teles | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Tks4Fish | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Trijnstel | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Vituzzu | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Wiki13 | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
Wim b | clear consensus to confirm |
Confirmed
|
علاء | clear consensus to confirm |
- Results
- The confirmation discussions are now closed. Please check the results just above.
- For the Election Committee, RadiX ∞ 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 107 (no issues / activity on the lower side but has a history of being active / trusted / good work / skilled / competent / helpful / knowledgeable / strong judgement / collaborative / rational / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 4 (no willingness to help the community / no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 99 (good work / very active / competent / helpful / hardworking / available on IRC / one of the most active stewards / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (issues regarding blocking open proxies / unsustainable activity level throughout the year)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (issues on lock evasion discussion / mostly good work)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 81 (active enough / helpful / reachable / chill dude according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 4 (activity level below reasonable / inactive)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Bsadowski1
[edit ]Keep Keep: 78 (very helpful / active / friendly / trusted / competent / available on IRC / reachable / one of the best stewards / knowledge of Star Wars is a true blessing and something of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (acceptable cross-wiki work / unsatisfying overall work)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 59 (active enough given the circumstances / active enough / behind the scene tasks should be considered / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (unsatisfying overall work / stewardship isn't about trustworthy)
Neutral Neutral: 4 (no reason given)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 63 (moderately active / active enough / reasonable activity level throughout the year / good work at SRG / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 1 (not doing 'real' steward work)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 109 (responsive oversighter / active everywhere / good long-term work besides low activity this year / active enough / trustworthy / no concerns / good job / experienced / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (unrelated comment - user has been blocked)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 70 (active enough / active throughout the year / helpful / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 2 (low activity level / silent)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 74 (activity level has improved since last confirmation / helpful / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Jon Kolbert
[edit ]Keep Keep: 73 (active / wonderful work / great steward / helpful in blocking proxies / proxies work / highly active in proxyblocking / the most active steward of 2021 / vegetarian - something of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (alleged bias in the 'Rodhullandemu' case)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (lacks involvement in SRG)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 56 (active enough / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (activity level has not improved in 2 years)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (activity should be increased)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
MarcGarver
[edit ]Keep Keep: 58 (active / uncontroversial user / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 1 (active enough at cross-wiki spamblocks but lacks involvement other areas)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
MarcoAurelio
[edit ]Keep Keep: 109 (a grandee among the stewards / one of the most active stewards / quick responses / loves cats according to BRPever and Zabe / consistently good work / active throughout the year / active all around / active in every task / helpful in AAR tasks / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 133 (active in every task / one of the most active stewards / very active / extremely capable / very helpful / sound / valuable steward / reachable / reachable on IRC / does 'real' steward work / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 8 (untrustworthy / discussion at English Wikipedia Village Pump / offensive comment / cases of misuse or even abuse of steward rights - no examples provided)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (question about whether - or not - an action should be performed by WMF staff or stewards)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 82 (very helpful / very active in account locking and IP blocking / helpful with LTA / good work / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 70 (active enough / solid and good work / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 1 (question about whether - or not - an action should be performed by WMF staff or stewards)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
MusikAnimal
[edit ]Keep Keep: 85 (active in almost every task / great vandal fighter / active enough / technically skilled / very good admin and interface admin on enwiki / always assumes good faith / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Operator873
[edit ]Keep Keep: 75 (good work at SRG / valuable work / impressive work / very active / trusted / helpful / competent / reachable on IRC / friendly / humble / diplomatic / unfortunately unable to get a hold of him according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 77 (has the finest sense of humour of any steward, exquisite taste in coffee/wine and vast knowlegde of riots, things of utmost importance for stewardship according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 90 (very active / active throughout the year / one of the most qualified stewards / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 74 (active enough / no issues / good at locking LTAs / very active / good experience / relevant CU work / polite / friendly / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 81 (good activity level / moderate activity level / active / good work / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (unrelated comment - user has been blocked)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 111 (one of the best stewards ever / active everywhere / great work overall / outstanding work at SRCU / excellent CU work / the most active steward at SRCU / combat of sockpupptry, LTA and cross-wiki abuse / very helpful / calm / kind / wise / reachable / does not have an "InstantPot" according to TonyBallioni / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Stanglavine
[edit ]Keep Keep: 73 (active / helpful / always available on IRC / no issues / helpful in AAR tasks / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 75 (active enough / reasonably active / reachable / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 77 (good at fighting LTA / active / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 66 (great work with spambots / very active / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 97 (very helpful / friendly / trusted / reliable / sound / active / very active / competent / responsible / helpful with proxy global blocking / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 89 (active enough / no doubt / good work / helpful / helpful with requests at SRG and dealing with backlogs / good person / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (communication issue)
Neutral Neutral: 1 (no reason given)
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 81 (trusted / excellent steward / hardworking / helpful / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 67 (very active / helpful / good at dealing with open proxies / available on IRC / no issues / is a user after my own heart according to TonyBallioni / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 67 (active enough / always available / reachable / no concerns / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 0
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
Keep Keep: 102 (successful at dealing with sockpuppetry / helpful / helpful at SRG / active / kind and generous person / helpful in AAR tasks / helpful in cross-wiki issues / no issues / no reason given)
Remove Remove: 1 (no reason given)
Neutral Neutral: 0
- Note
- You can either choose to leave a comment on every candidate or to confirm/remove all at once. RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
All stewards running for confirmation
[edit ]- Note
- Should you be decided to drop your comment here, please don't forget to add Confirm all or Remove all to your text. Thanks, RadiX ∞ 17:37, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Note
- The discussion below applies to all stewards listed in the sections above, except the one commenting. RadiX ∞ 22:01, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all 😁 -- TNT (talk • she/her) 18:30, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, especially those who love cats. Vermont (talk) 19:20, 28 February 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all — MusikAnimal talk 01:17, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, consensus to keep.-BRP ever 01:28, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all. Sgd. —Hasley 01:30, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all. No issues.—Teles «Talk ˱C L @ S ˲» 02:08, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all including Melos, overwhelming consensus. [24Cr ][talk ] 06:48, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all Clear consensus to retain all delegates. Operator873 connect 07:33, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all --Alaa :)..! 08:31, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all --Base (talk) 10:49, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all MarcGarver (talk) 11:27, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all —Thanks for the fish! talk•contrib (he/him) 15:57, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, pretty clear feedback. Neutral about myself, of course. —DerHexer (Talk) 22:03, 1 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, no issues or immediate concerns, happy with the feedback also.--HakanIST (talk) 06:57, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, Neutral about myself. Matanya (talk) 15:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, Neutral about myself. --Wim b 18:44, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, neutral about myself. —MarcoAurelio (talk) 18:51, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all. Ruslik (talk) 20:56, 2 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all. Trijnstel talk 19:57, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all. -- Tegel (Talk) 22:15, 3 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all Stryn (talk) 13:37, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all masti <talk> 21:51, 4 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all --Martin Urbanec (talk) 10:38, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all except about myself. --Sotiale (talk) 11:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all Jon Kolbert (talk) 22:11, 5 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all --Defender (talk) 22:34, 6 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Confirm all, especially those who are chill dudes and vegetarians, don't have an "InstantPot" and also have a vast knowledge of Star Wars. RadiX ∞ 04:18, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Reply
- Outcome: All confirmed. RadiX ∞ 17:31, 7 March 2022 (UTC) Reply