Vikipedi'nin Ay Yolculuğu/Oylama
Vikipedi'nin Ay Yolculuğu projesinde içeriğin toplanması ve düzenlenmesi konusunda en iyi yolu bulabilmek için yapılan oylamanın gerçekleştiği yer burasıdır. Arasından seçim yapılacak tasarıların tartışmaları ve gelişimi için lütfen 1. Aşama: Tasarılar sayfasına bakınız. Tasarıların taslak aşaması tamamlanmış olup aşağıda oylama işlemi için kısaltılmış şeklini bulabilirsiniz. Oylama işlemi 24 Haziran 2016'ya kadar devam edecektir.
Nasıl oy kullanılır
Kullanıcı erişim düzeyi veya haklarına bakılmaksızın herkes oy kullanabilir. Oy kullanmadan önce lütfen giriş yapın ya da [$register|kaydolun]. IP kullanıcıların verdiği oylar sayıma dahil edilmeyecektir.
- Aşağıda listelenen tasarı sayısı kadar oy hakkınız bulunmaktadır. Daha fazla değil. Hepsini kullanabilirsiniz ancak elbette kullanmak zorunda da değilsiniz.
- Her tasarı için sadece 1 oy.
- Oylama şekli "destekleyici"dir. Bunun anlamı sadece ilgili tasarıyı destekleyen oyların sayılacağıdır. "Karşı" oy mevcut değildir.
Sonuçlar nasıl yorumlanacaktır
- En çok oy alan tasarı kazanacaktır. (Unutmayın, tüm oylar destekleyicidir.)
- Çoğunluk oyu sistemi uygulanmaktadır. (diğer adıyla "nisbi çoğunluk"). Bunun anlamı en çok oyu alan tasarının kazanması için bir yüzdelik sınırı (örneğin %50) geçmesinin gerekmediğidir.
- 9 tanesi veri diskinin evrensel bir topluluk olarak nasıl kullanılması ile ilgili farklı öneriler olmak üzere toplamda oy kullanılabilecek 10 tasarı bulunmaktadır. Bununla birlikte son tasarı esasında bir "hayır" oyudur. Vikipedi'nin Ay Yolculuğu projesinde evrensel bir topluluk olarak çalışmaması gerektiğini önermektedir. Diğer tasarılardan herhangi birine oy veren kişilerin sayısını geçebilirse kazanan tasarı olarak değerlendirilebilecektir.
Oy kullanın
Let's work on: a Wikipedia canon
Senaryoların bir kısmı (örneğin "dil bilinmezci" senaryo ile "Tüm vikilerdeki tüm "en önemli" maddeler" senaryosu) en başta yapılan ilk üç öneriden biri olan Kanon senaryosunun az çok farklı versiyonları gibi görünüyor. Ana fikir, belli bir dil yerine, ele alınacak konuyu temsil eden bir madde seti belirlemek. Bu madde seti üzerinde anlaşıldıktan sonra maddelerini mümkün olduğunca çok dile çevirmek gerekecek. Kanon senaryolarında önemli bir mesele, madde seçimi için kriterlerin belirlenmesi.
Votes: a Wikipedia canon
- --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Mysteriumen (talk) 23:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:12, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Gerrit (talk) 12:40, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --NaBUru38 (talk)
- --Eritain (talk) 00:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Tonystewart14 (talk) 21:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Arussom (talk) 02:06, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:47, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: TOP30 lists
Bu tasarının genel kural fikrinin ters hali olduğu söylenebilir. Tasarıya göre tüm Vikipedi topluluğunu kapsayan tek bir madde topluluğu yerine her dil topluluğu kendi En İyi 30 maddesini sunma imkanına sahip olacaktır.
Votes: TOP30 lists
- -- Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:47, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Maria.martelli (talk) 20:18, 10 June 2016 (UTC)--[reply ]
- Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --GunChleoc (talk) 12:08, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- José Luiz talk 21:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Postcrosser (talk) 12:37, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:02, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Waters.Justin (talk) 15:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- AveroXY (talk) 16:11, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Zabia (talk) 18:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Franco3450 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --ONUnicorn (talk) 19:06, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:55, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Carnildo (talk) 21:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Golan's mom (talk) 05:58, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Joalpe (talk) 01:55, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sthelen.aqua (talk) 13:24, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Dimi z (talk) 14:38, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Chickadee46 (talk) 20:49, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- — Yerpo Eh? 17:26, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Filipinayzd (talk) 17:42, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:07, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: a nominated items list
Başlangıçdaki önerilerden üçüncüsü, her kayıtlı kullanıcının dil ya da diğer engellerden bağımsız olarak tek bir öneri yapabileceği açık bir liste öngörmektedir.
Discussion_Scenario_.23List:
Votes: a nominated items list
- —DerHexer (Talk) 10:19, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Golan's mom (talk) 11:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Bastenbas (talk) 13:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Irn (talk) 15:12, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Carlsrator (talk) 18:52, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --DS-fax 17:24, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: Taking "Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon" to the moon!
Bu tasarı sadece Ay maddesinin mevcut olduğu tüm dillerdeki versiyonları ile birlikte gönderilmesini yani sadece tek bir maddenin seçilmesini önermektedir.
Votes: Taking "Mond/Maan/Луна/Månen/Mjesec/Bulan/Hold/Luna/Księżyc/Lua/Mesiac/Ay/Moon/ਚੰਦਰਮਾ" to the moon!
- Almafeta (talk) 16:24, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Liridon (talk) 16:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Seb az86556 (talk) 16:41, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Lsanabria (talk) 19:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:32, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --స్వరలాసిక (talk) 00:35, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Michaelpires (talk) 02:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:10, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Klaas `Z4␟` V: 05:33, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Mike Coppolano (talk) 08:20, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --valepert (talk) 10:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Barbaking (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Golan's mom (talk) 11:29, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --GunChleoc (talk) 12:07, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- —JerrySa1 (talk) 13:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Winstonza (talk) 14:06, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Mickey83 (talk) 14:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Teamihlehyn (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- TOW talk 08:08, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Daniele Pugliesi (talk) 14:37, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Palnatoke (talk) 09:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Postcrosser (talk) 12:38, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- HvW (talk) 12:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -Nyiffi (talk) 14:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) Though I dont like the part about "picking just one article". The Moon articles won't fill the disc, so this should be combined with other scenarios.[reply ]
- --CristianCantoro (talk) 15:48, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Zabia (talk) 17:59, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- ONUnicorn (talk) 19:07, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --YjM (talk) 19:43, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Jonathunder (talk) 19:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Moony22 (talk) 21:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Khutuck (talk) 22:29, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Bora (talk) 22:46, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- YenilenebilirAdam MESAJ 16:24, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --User:Trurle (talk) 23:03, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Popo le Chien (talk) 14:33, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer 19:13, 18 June 2016 (UTC) It would be our Rosetta Stone[reply ]
- Olsi (talk) 23:37, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --e.c. 23:33, 29 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: a global editathon on Astronomy
Bu tasarı Astronomi konusunda bir ay sürecek "düzenleme etkinliği" yapılmasını önermektedir. Bu etkinlik sanal olacaktır. Yani çevrimiçi düzenlenecektir ve dünyanın her yerinden katılım sağlanabilecektir. Katılımcılar astronomi ile ilgili maddelere katkı yapacaklardır.
Votes: a global editathon on Astronomy
- --GunChleoc (talk) 12:09, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Mickey83 (talk) 14:38, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Vikas Hegde (talk) 09:22, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:51, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:05, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Tanweer (talk) 10:38, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Litlok (talk) 20:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- ~ Moheen (talk) 22:32, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Metrónomo-Goldwyn-Mayer 19:12, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: All featured articles and lists on all Wikipedias
Seçkin maddeler bu tasarının da temel fikrini oluşturmaktadır. Bu tasarı, tüm diller için, seçkin maddeler veya benzer şekilde genelden ayrılan maddeler arasından seçim yapılmasını önermektedir.
Votes: All featured articles and lists on all Wikipedias
- --AzorAhai (talk) 15:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --JTCEPB (talk) 16:05, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Liridon (talk) 16:34, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Arian Talk 17:26, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Andrew Dalby (talk) 18:22, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --MrBn (talk) 18:52, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Lsanabria (talk) 19:40, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- NMaia (talk) 20:16, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Marcus Cyron (talk) 20:37, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Фред-Продавец звёзд (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:06, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- MichaelSchoenitzer (talk) 21:31, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- GrandCelinien (talk) 22:35, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Colonel Wilhelm Klink (talk) 23:20, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Tetraktys (talk) 23:38, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Gts-tg (talk) 00:22, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Michaelpires (talk) 02:16, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Klaas `Z4␟` V: 05:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Like tears in rain (talk) 06:52, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Murbaut (talk) 07:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Bspf (talk) 08:24, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Cavaliere grande (talk) 09:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Lotus 50 (talk) 10:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --g (talk) 10:23, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Coolland (talk) 10:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Stang 11:00, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Titou (talk 11:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Winter eu 11:36, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Marica Massaro (talk) 12:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --JerrySa1 (talk) 13:51, 11 June 2016 (UTC) Assuming that the number is ~40,000, the rest goes to the next place, third place, etc. I would like to see combinations of proposals.[reply ]
- --Winstonza (talk) 14:05, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Irn (talk) 15:13, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Mathanaharan (talk) 17:17, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- José Luiz talk 20:59, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Halibutt (talk) 22:49, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Yiyi (talk) 23:27, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Jopparn (talk) 03:47, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- — xaosflux Talk 05:28, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sumita Roy Dutta (talk) 06:38, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Ανώνυμος Βικιπαιδιστής (talk) 14:45, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Rupertsciamenna (talk) 18:10, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- ~Mable (chat) 07:21, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Palnatoke (talk) 09:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Zamaster4536 (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Ghilt (talk) 12:36, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Gerrit (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Fanfwah (talk) 12:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Syced (talk) 12:49, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:56, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Braveheart (talk) 13:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Cruifer (talk) 13:27, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Nahum (talk) 13:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Breogan2008 (talk) 14:05, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -Nyiffi (talk) 14:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- CreativeC38 (talk) 16:03, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Zzyzx (talk) 17:45, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Zabia (talk) 17:58, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- — Antimuonium U wanna talk? 18:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Soul Train (talk) 20:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Alvaro Vidal-Abarca (talk) 20:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Moony22 (talk) 21:44, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Frettie (talk) 21:52, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Carnildo (talk) 21:53, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Ozzie10aaaa (talk) 22:08, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Bora (talk) 23:00, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Eritain (talk) 00:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Golan's mom (talk) 05:59, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Spirit of Eagle (talk) 06:25, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --কৌশিক বিশ্বাস (talk) 10:13, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Tanweer (talk) 10:40, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Fano (talk) 14:04, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Omnilaika02 (talk) 14:57, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --MRG90 (talk) 17:47, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --White DemΩn (talk) 21:18, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Lucas (talk) 23:06, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Rodrigo Padula (talk) 23:28, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Pablo Darko (talk) 11:22, 15 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Stepro (talk) 04:07, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Chiborg (talk) 14:35, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Paolotacchi (talk) 03:58, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Samuele2002 (talk) 07:36, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --wL <speak·check> 05:54, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Olsi (talk) 23:38, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --3Jo7 (talk) 11:48, 20 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Florian838 (talk) 20:22, 21 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Uğurkent talk 22:06, 21 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Galobtter (talk) 09:06, 23 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Pakeha (talk) 14:20, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:09, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: information about cutting-edge technology
The angle of this proposal is to look back at the content of other time capsules, which yield information about technology from the respective times.
Votes: information about cutting-edge technology
- --MrBn (talk) 18:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- 21:15, 10 June 2016 (UTC)
- ...Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:41, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --RookJameson (talk) 15:23, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Shashwat986 (talk) 18:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Miguu (talk) 16:10, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Chickadee46 (talk) 20:44, 18 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sergey WereWolf (talk) 11:29, 19 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: Decoding with DNA
This one looks beyond humans, literally. What to include on the disc that could be useful, in case by some means it would be possible (for someone?) to bring back humanity from extinction.
Votes: Decoding with DNA
- --MrBn (talk) 18:55, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Aranae (talk) 20:56, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:10, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- #--Mickey83 (talk) 14:39, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 11:30, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --AfroThundr3007730 (talk) 12:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Blackhat999 (talk) 14:54, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Zzyzx (talk) 17:57, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- Shashwat986 (talk) 18:31, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Anntinomy (talk) 07:59, 24 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: Risk of Extinction
Have you heard about lists of endangered species? This scenario is about collecting content regarding information about things that will probably be gone soon.
Votes: Risk of Extinction
- --MrBn (talk) 18:54, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Aranae (talk) 20:57, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- 4nn1l2 (talk) 21:12, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- ...Bhaskaranaidu (talk) 03:11, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --AzorAhai (talk) 09:37, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Titou (talk) 11:15, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Bastenbas (talk) 13:18, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- Irn (talk) 15:14, 11 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Evolutionoftheuniverse (talk) 22:42, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Eric.LEWIN (talk) 00:53, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Miguu (talk) 16:07, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --MRG90 (talk) 17:48, 14 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Sir Shurf (talk) 11:10, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --Chiborg (talk) 14:36, 16 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- --PupyFaki (talk) 18:04, 17 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- -- IKHazarika (talk) 05:11, 25 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Let's work on: ... wait, no, let's not
This option represents questions about the basic idea of Wikipedia to the Moon. Should the worldwide community engage and edit content within this project? To include these voices, we've added this option.
Votes: ... wait, no, let's not
- Natuur12 (talk) 18:42, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- AndyVolykhov (talk) 20:07, 10 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- —Marco Aurelio 10:28, 11 June 2016 (UTC) I'd hope that we had so much enthusiasm on rather more important things such as fixing bugs and admin tools development. Apparently not this year either...[reply ]
- BethNaught (talk) 08:29, 12 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- pne (talk) 16:13, 13 June 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
- I don't like any of the options (including this one). Nemo 16:11, 18 July 2016 (UTC) [reply ]
Sonuç
Oylam 24 Haziran 2016'ya kadar devam edecke. Sonuçlar ertesi sabah Wikimania'da ....ve elbetteki burada duyurulacak.
What happens now? This result means that Wikipedians from every language community are warmly invited in the upcoming weeks and months to work on their best articles and lists, to be included on the data disc. Details about how to actually do things will follow in the next few days.
For now, thanks to everyone who voted! We put the proposal up on Meta-Wiki on 24 April. The pages were immediately translated by volunteers into more than 60 languages. Many people engaged in the 6-week-discussion about how (and if) to work on this together. Out of 17 scenarios, 10 were available to be voted on over the past 2 weeks. Now the working phase/editing will be open until 31 October, leaving much time to select and improve content, or solve challenges along the way.
The goal is to finish our "Wikipedia time capsule" by 5 December 2016, which is International Volunteers Day.
Notlar
(追記) (追記ここまで) Please note: Two of the scenarios that have been discussed expand their ideas beyond Wikipedia itself, one proposing to select content from all Wikimedia projects, the other focusing on Wikidata. Both scenarios are valid suggestions, but we have been explicitly approached for Wikipedia, not other projects for this gift. The following are all eligible proposals: