Wikimedia Forum

Hi, we did add a proposition for a new project. We would be glad to have your feedbacks. Here it is : https://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Wikiwebsites

It's about a "Library of free projects" (excluding software). Art, science, architecture, comics, movies, pictures,... which can be found under Creative commons licences, but also Open hardware, GFDL, public domain, Art Libre, FOIA... Graineahumus (talk)

I have some questions 1how come Wikipedia is single page? is the money from Google and Wikipedia enterprize and others not enough for 2 page entries 2why isn't Wikipedia decentralised yet 3why isnt trust and safety intervening there are exterimist admins and stewards , people in janny roles for example the farsi wikipedia telegram is literally not allowing any kind of speech around iranian regime Baratiiman (talk) 15:11, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

@Baratiiman:

1. What do you mean by "single page"? Could you please explain in detail?
2. I think one of the major reasons is the technical challenge, as we would have to change our infrastructure significantly.
3. You can read this page to know more about Office Actions performed by Trust and Safety. If you have any concerns, you may contact them. However, I suggest following local processes to raise your concerns before reaching out to T&S.

SCP -20 00 08:35, 13 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

Illogical , it wouldn't be a fraction cost of the current centralized wiki Baratiiman (talk) 18:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

I hope I found an appropriate page to discuss a growing issue I noticed quite a lot, especially in German Wikipedia. German Wikipedia acts as being totally isolated from the international community and other language versions of Wikipedia and assumes all except themselves are totally unreliable. Even the sources have to be from scholars born in their country, otherwise they cannot be trusted. This is knowledge nationalism! Which is insane because knowledge is universal.

Here is an example:

There was an attempt to create a similar article to en:gaza genocide in german wikipedia: de:Völkermord-Vorwürfe gegen Israel (Gazakrieg 2023-2024). It was just a word by word translation by user User:Babel fish.

And here is what happened: The article is nominated for deletion and almost all editors currently vote for deletion. The justification reads like this: the article uses mainly Anglo-American sources. They are not reliable and tendentious, if not antisemitic. The article will only be reliable, German wikipedians claim, if it is sourced on German scholars. Can you believe this?

There is no trust in the groundwork done by English Wikipedia, the hard work done by their English Wikipedia fellows is worth nothing to them.

Why can't wikipedians from different language version work together as one team, and appreciate each others hard work?

How can we foster knowledge exchange across borders and teach respect for knowledge written by scholars of a different country? Laitonix (talk) 20:51, 15 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

Individual Wikipedias are editorially independent. If the German Wikipedia wants not to trust certain sources, then it's their loss and there's nothing anyone outside the German Wikipedia can do about it. Meta only intervenes in exceptional circumstances which this isn't. * Pppery * _{it has begun} 02:50, 16 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

I think in general, Wikimedia Foundation could try to foster the exchange between wikipedians e.g. with international meetups (and funding travel costs), try to build connections across language borders. At the moment, there are none. At least I can tell you this from German Wikipedia. They don't learn from each other. If Wikimedia Foundation with all its funding should have one job, then to unite different fragmented, local groups to leverage the combined "wisdom of the crowd".

In this specific case, you could even raise the question at which point German Wikipedia becomes complicit in a genocide. Not by purpose but by ignorance of any other opinion from the outside world. German Wikipedia sees only one side. They try everything to make the Palestinian death toll appear less server, pretend anti-palestinianism does not exist and the Gaza genocide accusations are just disinformation and should have no place to even mention in Wikipedia. Instead, the Israelian war against the Palestinian people is presented as the only logical consequence and no further questions asked. In return, this sways public opinion in Germany to e.g. increase support for exporting more and more weapons to Israel. So yes, the German knowledge isolation can have drastic real life consequences! Laitonix (talk) 07:05, 16 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

Outcome: The article has now indeed been deleted. German Wikipedia indeed ignored the international scientific debate about the gaza genocide and just followed the narrative of the Israelien goverment. That's the state of German Wikipedia in 2024: their biased opinion is worth more than scientific sources. Keep an eye on what's happening in German Wikipedia, and always remember: Germany was on the wrong side of the history two times, and there is little evidence that it will be on the right side of history this time: Again Germans are indirectly involved in a genocide. English Wikipedia already has a chapter about it: German complicity in the gaza genocide. It's time for the international community to protect the integrity of Wikipedia, especially in Germany. --Laitonix (talk) 23:12, 23 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

According to this link, Georgian Wikiquote has 192 articles, but this link tells us it has 602 articles, also number is not updated after creating new articles MikheilBeruashvili (talk) 03:47, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

The second link is to the old stats site that doesn't work any more. The current data is available at https://stats.wikimedia.org/#/ka.wikiquote.org – if you look at this view, it reports 776 content pages at the end of July 2024, which is a lot more than the statistics page reports (192). Possibly they use the two different methods to determine what counts as a page. Jdforrester (WMF) (talk) 16:20, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

How could we fix it? Same happens with Moksha Wikipedia (mdf.wikipedia) now, everything with normal with the last one, and the problem suddenly started yesterday, if u know solution, could you look at this project?--MikheilBeruashvili (talk) 05:46, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

can any admin to help import https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Template:Webarchive to meta? Manojk (talk) 04:34, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hi all,

The next language community meeting is scheduled in a few weeks—on August 30th at 15:00 UTC. If you're interested in joining, you can sign up on this wiki page.

This participant-driven meeting will focus on sharing language-specific updates related to various projects, discussing technical issues related to language wikis, and working together to find possible solutions. For example, in the last meeting, topics included the Language Converter, the state of language research, updates on the Incubator conversations, and technical challenges around external links not working with special characters on Bengali sites.

Do you have any ideas for topics to share technical updates or discuss challenges? Please add agenda items to the document here and reach out to ssethi(__AT__)wikimedia.org. We look forward to your participation!

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 23:18, 22 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

Wikijunior is an multilingual subproject which exists within the Wikibooks project. For example, fr.wikibooks.org houses the French Wikijunior project. Here at meta, Wikijunior/Logo is in dire need of closure; it has been open for over a decade. There haven't been comments for more than a year. There has been plenty of discussion, and proposal A *appears* to be the favourite. What this really, deeply needs is for an experienced admin to come in and write a closing statement, so that an "official" logo can be initiated. Thanks, 🌺 Cremastra (talk) 14:24, 26 August 2024 (UTC) Reply

Original message at wikimedia-l. You can find this message translated into additional languages on Meta-wiki. Please help translate to your language

Hello all,

The scrutineers have finished reviewing the vote and the Elections Committee have certified the results for the Universal Code of Conduct Coordinating Committee (U4C) special election.

I am pleased to announce the following individual as regional members of the U4C, who will fulfill a term until 15 June 2026:

• North America (USA and Canada)
  • Ajraddatz

The following seats were not filled during this special election:

• Latin America and Caribbean
• Central and East Europe (CEE)
• Sub-Saharan Africa
• South Asia
• The four remaining Community-At-Large seats

Thank you again to everyone who participated in this process and much appreciation to the candidates for your leadership and dedication to the Wikimedia movement and community.

Over the next few weeks, the U4C will begin meeting and planning the 2024-25 year in supporting the implementation and review of the UCoC and Enforcement Guidelines. You can follow their work on Meta-Wiki.

On behalf of the U4C and the Elections Committee,

RamzyM (WMF) 14:05, 2 September 2024 (UTC) Reply

Hello all,

The voting period for the 2024 Board of Trustees election is now open. There are twelve (12) candidates running for four (4) seats on the Board.

Learn more about the candidates by reading their statements and their answers to community questions.

When you are ready, go to the SecurePoll voting page to vote. The vote is open from September 3rd at 00:00 UTC to September 17th at 23:59 UTC.

To check your voter eligibility, please visit the voter eligibility page.

Best regards,

The Elections Committee and Board Selection Working Group

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:13, 3 September 2024 (UTC) Reply

• Wikimedia Forum
• Noticeboards
• Communication
• Meta-Wiki organisation
• Multilingualism