Steward requests/Global permissions
This is not a vote and any active Wikimedia editor may participate in the discussion.
Global rollback and global interface editor requests require no fewer than 5 days of discussion while abuse filter helper and maintainer requests require no fewer than 7 days. Global renamer and global sysop requests require no fewer than 2 weeks of discussion. For requests that are unlikely to pass under any circumstances, they may be closed by a steward without further discussion (after a reasonable amount of input).
Quick navigation:Cross-wiki requests |
---|
Meta-Wiki requests |
Requests for global rollback permissions
- Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
- Please also review the Global rollback policy.
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting, make sure that: You have sufficient activity to meet the requirements to be allocated the global rollback flag
=== Global rollback for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} === {{sr-request |status = <!-- don't change this line --> |domain = global <!-- don't change this line --> |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user --> }} ::''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+5 days}} UTC'' The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than 5 days (with rare exceptions , no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. |
Requests for global sysop permissions
- Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions, and not doing so would reflect poorly on your suitability.
- Please also review the Global sysops policy.
- Stewards
- When you give someone global sysop rights, please list them on Users with global sysop access and ask them to subscribe to the global sysops mailing list.
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting, make sure that:
=== Global sysop for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} === {{sr-request |status = <!-- don't change this line --> |domain = global <!-- don't change this line --> |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} <!-- don't change this line unless you're nominating another user --> }} :''Not ending before {{subst:#time:j F Y H:i|+2 week}} UTC'' The request will be approved if consensus to do so exists after a period of consideration of no less than two weeks (no exceptions are allowed no matter how obvious the result may seem). This is not a vote, and all input is welcome. Stewards will determine whether consensus exists; when doing so it is likely that the weight given to the input of those involved in cross-wiki work will be most influential. Please note: Since 2019 all global sysops are required to have two-factor authentication (2FA) enabled. |
Global sysop for TheresNoTime
- Global user: TheresNoTime (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )
- Not ending before 26 March 2024 15:36 UTC
Hello! As someone who has previously done quite a bit of xwiki maintenance/anti-vandalism work (primarily as a steward), and wishes to keep helping out on smaller projects as and when the need arises, I am requesting global sysop permissions. This desire has most recently come from my closing of this phabricator task (with my "sysadmin hat" on) and referring the user to potentially reach out to the GSs — I noticed there's as always work to be done on these smaller projects, and I have the experience to help.
For full transparency, I resigned my stewardship due in part to an incident in October 2022 which resulted in the loss of my checkuser/oversight permissions on the English Wikipedia. I regret my actions, and posted a public apology in May of 2023. I again here reaffirm my apologies, and hope my previous positive track record and desire to be helpful makes up for my mistakes. Many thanks — TheresNoTime (talk • they/them) 15:36, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support trusted --Johannnes89 (talk) 15:43, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support LGTM --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 15:46, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Hoo man (talk) 16:08, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support – DreamRimmer (talk ) 16:16, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support, but make sure to follow your own advice when needed (especially on taking a break). It's not common for someone to have these many chances from my experience, and I could see a different user being met with a less-pleasant response from the community. Leaderboard (talk) 16:30, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support ~ Yahya (talk • contribs) 16:44, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Julius 12345 (talk) 17:05, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support — Elton (talk) 20:18, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --M/ (talk) 20:20, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Ameisenigel (talk) 22:04, 12 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support. —— Eric Liu (Talk ) 06:47, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support -Fastily 08:19, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --V0lkanic (talk) 08:23, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support -- DARIO SEVERI (talk) 09:33, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Alaa :)..! 15:07, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support. Valuable user, and the apologies seems very honest. Eta Carinae (talk) 15:14, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support —MdsShakil (talk) 15:51, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support.--WikiBayer 👤💬 16:11, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support seems like the issue leading to the previous resignation/removal of CUOS won't be replicated and would be unlikely to happen with GS tools anyway. Trusted overall, mistakes are allowed. – Ajraddatz (talk) 17:34, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Strong support Strong support--Mtarch11 (talk) 18:06, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support -J. Ansari Talk 18:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Sakretsu (炸裂) 20:36, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support per Ajraddatz --1108-Kiju/Talk 23:38, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support :D Vermont (🐿️—🏳️🌈) 23:46, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Oppose Sorry, but I am still hesitant even though it has been a year since the incident. I may support in a year or two (and understand your apology and thank you for making one), but now is too early – maybe at the end of the year I'll consider. --SHB2000 (talk | contribs) 10:55, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support per everybody else. Codename Noreste 🤔 talk 19:16, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support * Pppery * it has begun 19:31, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Neriah - 💬 - 21:05, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support -- LGTM. Drummingman (talk) 22:11, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- I honestly don't see TNT being much active in the area that requires this toolset. The motivation here seems to be the declined task but GS/R suggests that the requests are being dealt with promptly. It's not actually lack of trust that concerns me, but general lack of activity on the area.--BRP ever 17:26, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support OK, no problem for me. Hide on Rosé t 14:01, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Okay. People do make mistakes, but most importantly is learn from those mistakes. Jianhui67 talk ★contribs 16:10, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Oppose Don't see a big need for the tools. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 18:05, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ] - Support Support LGTM --DannyS712 (talk) 18:57, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Pile on - FlightTime (open channel) 20:27, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Lookruk 💬 (Talk) 11:51, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support Obviously trusted user who has access across multiple advanced (both technical and non-technical) userrights. Also, even if they are not active right now, I believe they can become more active in the long term. Sohom (talk) 16:44, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Generally I would like to see someone being active in small-wiki-related issues before requesting GS, not the other way around. Being entrusted with specific user rights does not automatically guarantee the experience needed for different permissions. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 19:16, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]- @1234qwer1234qwer4 They were fairly active in GS areas (as a steward) in the not so distant past, which should be more than enough to show experience for GS. We really shouldn't be putting up artificial barriers for experienced editors returning back from a stretch of inactivity, since it effectively encourages peeps to game the system to keep perms and/or risk burnout. Sohom (talk) 13:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- I have not seen them active in GS areas as a steward, nor have they provided any evidence of that in their nomination (their crossactivity for small wikis seems to largely consist of creating their own local account). If they want to return[...] back from a stretch of inactivity (quite a euphemistic way of putting it, IMHO), they should run for steward in the next elections, unless they can demonstrate that they need the GS permissions in particular. ~~~~
User:1234qwer1234qwer4 (talk) 14:37, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- I have not seen them active in GS areas as a steward, nor have they provided any evidence of that in their nomination (their crossactivity for small wikis seems to largely consist of creating their own local account). If they want to return[...] back from a stretch of inactivity (quite a euphemistic way of putting it, IMHO), they should run for steward in the next elections, unless they can demonstrate that they need the GS permissions in particular. ~~~~
- @1234qwer1234qwer4 They were fairly active in GS areas (as a steward) in the not so distant past, which should be more than enough to show experience for GS. We really shouldn't be putting up artificial barriers for experienced editors returning back from a stretch of inactivity, since it effectively encourages peeps to game the system to keep perms and/or risk burnout. Sohom (talk) 13:05, 19 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Generally I would like to see someone being active in small-wiki-related issues before requesting GS, not the other way around. Being entrusted with specific user rights does not automatically guarantee the experience needed for different permissions. ~~~~
- Support Support -Lionel Cristiano (talk) 10:57, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Oppose Oppose per what BRPever and 2[1234qwer]4 have already said, sorry. --Ferien (talk) 19:35, 18 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support LGTM Seawolf35 (talk) 12:11, 20 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support--Infinite0694 (Talk) 14:23, 21 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Support Support --Wutsje (talk) 01:21, 22 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Requests for global rename permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Requests for global IP block exemption
- Your request might be rejected if you don't follow the instructions. Please review Global IP block exemption. You may request Global IP block exemption via stewards(_AT_)wikimedia.org if you can not edit this page.
- Please note: Global IP block exemption does NOT make one immune to locally-created blocks of any sort, only global blocks.
Instructions for making a request
|
---|
Before requesting global IP block exemption, make sure that:
=== Global IP block exempt for {{subst:u|{{subst:REVISIONUSER}}}} === {{sr-request |status = <!--don't change this line--> |domain = global<!--don't change this line--> |user name = {{subst:REVISIONUSER}} }} <Add an explanation here>, thanks, --~~~~ The request will be approved if there is demonstrated need for the permission, such as bypassing a global block from someone who is not the intended target. |
Global IP block exempt for Uyiliu2
- Global user: Uyiliu2 (edits (alt) • CA • global groups • crossactivity • verify 2FA )
I have to use a proxy due to local policy, and I hope to be unblocked. I need to add cross-language links to newly created articles and submit my own images to Wikimedia.Thank you so much --Uyiliu2 (talk) 08:37, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- What policy requires using a proxy? Our policy (no open proxies) certainly doesn't require using a proxy. — xaosflux Talk 10:08, 13 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- The policy here refers to the policy of mainland China. I need to use a proxy to access and edit Wikimedia sites, but my IP is often blocked. Therefore, I hope to be granted GIPBE to avoid being affected. Thanks!--Uyiliu2 (talk) 05:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- @Uyiliu2 What wikis are you having issues with, as I see you are exempt on the ZH and EN wikipedias. I do not think global exempt would be beneficial for only a couple of wikis unless you were a sysop or something similar. Da Lamb Talk to me! Please don't eat da 🐑! 19:47, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- see here for zh.wikipedia and here for en.wikipedia. TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 14:06, 15 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yes, I applied for local IP exemption for the Chinese Wiki and English Wiki. I am from mainland China and had to use a proxy. Therefore, I was banned from all IP addresses. Then I was unable to use Wikimedia Foundation projects such as Wikidata normally. For example, I could not edit interlanguage links.--Uyiliu2 (talk) 10:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Okay, good. If you applied for local IPBE on zhwiki & enwiki, you don't need Global IPBE anymore, right? Than you can withdraw this request. --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 10:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- I’m afraid I cannot. I wish to use Wikimedia data and Wikimedia Commons normally, such as editing interlanguage links and uploading images to Wikimedia Commons. However, I am currently prohibited from doing so. Other than applying for GIPBE, do you have any other recommendations?If there is a better method, I would be very eager to try it.--Uyiliu2 (talk) 05:37, 17 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Okay, good. If you applied for local IPBE on zhwiki & enwiki, you don't need Global IPBE anymore, right? Than you can withdraw this request. --TenWhile6 (talk | SWMT) 10:18, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Yes, I applied for local IP exemption for the Chinese Wiki and English Wiki. I am from mainland China and had to use a proxy. Therefore, I was banned from all IP addresses. Then I was unable to use Wikimedia Foundation projects such as Wikidata normally. For example, I could not edit interlanguage links.--Uyiliu2 (talk) 10:14, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- The policy here refers to the policy of mainland China. I need to use a proxy to access and edit Wikimedia sites, but my IP is often blocked. Therefore, I hope to be granted GIPBE to avoid being affected. Thanks!--Uyiliu2 (talk) 05:56, 14 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
- Maybe I didn’t explain clearly before.To give a brief summary, I am from mainland China.I need to use a proxy to access and edit Wikimedia sites, but my IP is blocked. Therefore, I hope to be granted GIPBE to avoid being affected. Thanks!--Uyiliu2 (talk) 10:19, 16 March 2024 (UTC) [reply ]
Requests for 2 Factor Auth tester permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
Requests for other global permissions
Please be sure to follow the instructions below:
|
See also
- User groups — Information on user groups
- Global rights log — Log of global permissions changes
- Archives
- 2025: no archives yet (create)
General requests for: help from a Meta sysop or bureaucrat · deletion (speedy deletions: local · multilingual) · URL blacklisting · new languages · interwiki map
Personal requests for: username changes · permissions (global) · bot status · adminship on Meta · CheckUser information (local) · local administrator help
Cooperation requests for: comments (local) (global) · translation