User talk:Ruslik0
Hi friend, why did you block me? I dont know much about editing. It was a mistake. Pls unblock me. Contact me- gil2016ad@gmail.com
R. Giskard Reventlov@wawiktionary
(from Steward requests/Bot status#R. Giskard Reventlov@wawiktionary) Hello,
I'm replying on the request page (in short, yes it is a special account).
Steward requests
- Help please
- Could you please provide bot access to my user id itself. [[1]]
Round 2 Re-submission of Arc.heolo.gy proposal
Hi there Ruslik,
I have decided to reapply for the Round 2 of the 2016 Project Grant applications.
I selected to create a new proposal, and it seemed to simply overlay the new information on the old application page, therefore leaving my updates and revisions on the Round 2 version attached to the "Past Proposals" link to the application.
Do you know how I would get this updated version bumped into the "Current Proposal" sections?
020730szm
Hi, I was wondering, doyou know if it is possible for a rangeblock on this guy and his socks? Pyrusca (talk) 13:28, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
- They use many ranges. Ruslik (talk) 17:36, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
- So its not possible then? ok Pyrusca (talk) 22:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
- Comment Comment - the current IP address of Szm is 121.207.95.20 xwiki-contribs • xwiki-date (alt) • ST • IP info • WHOIS • robtex • gblock • glist • abuselog • bullseye . See [https://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?
- So its not possible then? ok Pyrusca (talk) 22:14, 15 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
title=Special%3ALog&type=block&user=&page=user%3A121.207.0.0%2F16&year=&month=-1&tagfilter=&subtype= full block] on enwiki and here. This user is from w:Quanzhou, so, for me, the range is only used by this vandal. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 22:21, 15 October 2016 (UTC).Reply
- The last sock that I locked a few days ago had address from 110.81.0.0/16. So, it is not so simple. Ruslik (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
- Another one. Pyrusca (talk) 15:24, 29 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
- The last sock that I locked a few days ago had address from 110.81.0.0/16. So, it is not so simple. Ruslik (talk) 19:04, 16 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
Hi,
You have recently User:GL dili for cross-wiki abuse. Well, they appear to have returned with Global Dilidili (talk · contribs). Can you perform a global lock on this account too? Thanks. 2601:1C0:4401:F360:901C:10B8:EB70:E1DB 03:47, 30 October 2016 (UTC) Reply
Global rename request
Hello Ruslik0, I requested my username change about 12 hour ago but still my username is not changed. Please have a look. ThanksI am wikipedian (talk) 03:37, 6 November 2016 (UTC) Reply
Dear Rusliko, for some unclear reason I did not see your questions before now. I will answer shortly, but will review all this with the other project members. Sorry for the delay! --Nattes à chat (talk) 00:28, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Reply
No renaming between November 20 and November 27
Hi,
You’re getting this because you’re a steward or global renamer. The Community Tech team are working on cross-wiki watchlists. We need to add a couple of fields to the localuser table in centralauth database. In order to be able to do this, we’d need to run a script that will get in the way of renaming users. Our apologies – we realize this is getting in the way of your work.
We ask that you do not rename anyone between 00:00 November 20 (UTC) and 00:00 November 27 (UTC) .
(UTC means that if you live in the Americas, it will be on the evening or afternoon of November 19 when the script starts running, and if you live in Oceania or eastern Asia, it can be closer midday on November 27 before we can be sure the script is no longer running.)
If there are any problems related to this, or you have any questions, please write me on my talk page. /Johan (WMF) (talk) via MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 19:39, 17 November 2016 (UTC) Reply
Nipponese dog calvero
HI, This person using an ip created [2] page, which is a subpage of a user on polish wiki. The user likely DOESN'T know about it. Can you delete it please? Thanks. Pyrusca (talk) 19:39, 24 November 2016 (UTC) Reply
- Polish wiki has its own administrators. Please, ask them. Ruslik (talk) 15:51, 25 November 2016 (UTC) Reply
Can you please perform a global block on Incorrigible Troll (talk · contribs). 2601:1C0:104:EEBC:98A5:A0AC:AD6D:D743 02:36, 1 December 2016 (UTC) Reply
Lock Request
Special:Contributions/2009szm. flag vandal. MechQuester (talk) 23:46, 16 December 2016 (UTC) Reply
С Новым годом
Здравствуйте уважаемый Ruslik0, с Новым годом. Я вам на почту написал письмо.Hayordi (talk) 21:36, 1 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Я не отвечаю на частные письма. А вопросами восстановления паролей (если стандартные методы не работают) занимаются серверные администраторы. Ruslik (talk) 18:08, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Спасибо. А вы можете дать линк серверных админов, прошу помочь...---Hayordi (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- System administrators. Ruslik (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Здравствуете уважаемый @Ruslik0:, я написал на СО двоих сисадминов. @Jdforrester (WMF): так и не ответил, а @Yurik: не знает как помочь. У вас есть такое техническое возможность, чтобы помочь мне. Я не могу точно вспомнить пароль моего второго аккаунта - user:Bari srtik.--Hayordi (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- У меня нет. Ruslik (talk) 17:55, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Здравствуете уважаемый @Ruslik0:, я написал на СО двоих сисадминов. @Jdforrester (WMF): так и не ответил, а @Yurik: не знает как помочь. У вас есть такое техническое возможность, чтобы помочь мне. Я не могу точно вспомнить пароль моего второго аккаунта - user:Bari srtik.--Hayordi (talk) 12:18, 17 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- System administrators. Ruslik (talk) 19:02, 3 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Спасибо. А вы можете дать линк серверных админов, прошу помочь...---Hayordi (talk) 21:28, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
How to lock me
How can I (of course not this account) get globally locked without doing any disruptive things? --逆襲的天邪鬼 (talk) 11:48, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- You can ask on SRG. Ruslik (talk) 18:07, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- I have asked it on SRG and you said "It's not clear what the user is asking here". Maybe it's my fault because I just said User:Uw-block3 is my account (Of course I can prove it) but didn't say I want to get it locked. --逆襲的天邪鬼 (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Ok, I locked this account. Ruslik (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- And I eventually know what will happen if I'm locked. Thanks. --逆襲的天邪鬼 (talk) 18:29, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Ok, I locked this account. Ruslik (talk) 18:26, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- I have asked it on SRG and you said "It's not clear what the user is asking here". Maybe it's my fault because I just said User:Uw-block3 is my account (Of course I can prove it) but didn't say I want to get it locked. --逆襲的天邪鬼 (talk) 18:16, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
LTA
Hi sir, I'd like a new answer at Steward requests/Global. Thanks! --177.140.57.189 19:27, 2 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
Bot status#TajBot
Steward requests/Bot status#TajBot.40tgwikipedia --VASHGIRD (talk) 04:49, 5 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
About Szm accounts
Hi, I've looked that you locked suspected szm accounts like "2131szm" or "Szm2017". However, I'm not sure that the following accounts that you locked are a socks of 020730szm: [4] [6] [8] and these edits are only reverted by nepalese users, I suspect that nepalese users write a "self-denounce" on SRG [9] This is a text copied of my old report on SRG. 020730szm is a Chinese, you can check his IP address as sock of him, from Quanzhou. Those recent accounts that I've mentioned at first of this message, aren't a socks of 020730szm. I would like that you to see this situation again. --Ks-M9 [disc.] 16:39, 8 January 2017 (UTC).Reply
- You are right: they are not socks of 020730szm. These socks may be created by some newiki users. This is under investigation now. Ruslik (talk) 17:22, 8 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Any updates? MechQuester (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- No yet. Ruslik (talk) 18:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- More info about the sock can be found here: Ticket:2017011110002989 ~ Nahid Talk 07:53, 11 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- No yet. Ruslik (talk) 18:39, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Any updates? MechQuester (talk) 16:10, 9 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
IP block
Hey, I just tried to edit my own page: [[10]].
(I'm an author, It's in Hebrew) and discovered you blocked my IP address from all editing in Wikipedia or something like that... on grounds of *long term abuse*. What gives? I don't know much about Wiki, so maybe I've made an honest mistake and I'd appreciate it if you cancel this. I don't even know if you're getting this, so please contact me via email: jonyavin@hotmail.com —The preceding unsigned comment was added by 185.3.147.246 (talk)
- The block is not related to you. You can edit if you create an account. Ruslik (talk) 08:26, 15 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
OK. Thanks for clarifying!
NDC
About that last sock, I don't think this was Nipponese dog Calvero. It was korean and written in Korean. NDC is Chinese in Taiwan. Possibly someone creating the account? kind of like the Tulsi Bhagat thing? Because, it was typical for User:Lanwi1 to send a request for a lock and they usually edit on Japanese wiki (jawiki) or chinese wiki (zhwiki). The one mentioned above is from Korean wiki (kowiki). Im just a little suspicious. MechQuester (talk) 15:56, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- I do not speak languages. So, I can not really distinguish them. Yes, those accounts were created from Korea. Ruslik (talk) 16:00, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Is it possible an inposter? MechQuester (talk) 23:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- It may be, of course. Ruslik (talk) 08:44, 23 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Is it possible an inposter? MechQuester (talk) 23:17, 22 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
User:KHMELNYTSKYIA
Hi! I see User:KHMELNYTSKYIA was globally blocked by you. Why it happened? Could you please unblock he in Ukrainian projects at least, as Ukrainian Wikisources administrator I didn't see any destructive behavior here. We have not so much active users in Ukrainian Wikisources and User:KHMELNYTSKYIA is active and valuable contributor. Artem.komisarenko (talk) 18:25, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- They created a number of socks that have some destructive effects on other projects. See Stewards'_noticeboard#Rusyn Wikipedia. Ruslik (talk) 18:48, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Funny. But KHMELNYTSKYIA have no destructive contribution in other projects including Ukrainian Wikisource. Why he blocked in Ukrainian projects where he's active valuable contributor because vandalism in one mostly dead Rusyn Wikipedia? Artem.komisarenko (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Because if an individual does this on one project they can do this on any other project. So, you should look after him. As to the lock, they will remain locked unless they promise to stick to one account and never socketpuppet again. Ruslik (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- I have no contact with KHMELNYTSKYIA in real life but I didn't saw he's destructive activity before, if you unblock it I've ask it for not to do likely "jokes" things in future. Artem.komisarenko (talk) 20:50, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Because if an individual does this on one project they can do this on any other project. So, you should look after him. As to the lock, they will remain locked unless they promise to stick to one account and never socketpuppet again. Ruslik (talk) 20:27, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Funny. But KHMELNYTSKYIA have no destructive contribution in other projects including Ukrainian Wikisource. Why he blocked in Ukrainian projects where he's active valuable contributor because vandalism in one mostly dead Rusyn Wikipedia? Artem.komisarenko (talk) 20:12, 29 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
User:KHMELNYTSKYIA 2
Здравствуйте.
Извините за русский, а не английский.
Я заметил, что меня глобально заблокировали за "кросс-вики вандализм", якобы я виртуал или имею виртуала Словянин. Но это не так. Я не делал никаких вандальных действий, а в украиноязычных проектах тем более. Прошу объяснить в чем причина.
Хочу также сказать, что IP-адреса, с которой я написал, пользуются многие лица и время от время меняется провайдерами.
Я написал сообщение с IP-адреса, так как не имею возможности писать из-за блокирования. 195.20.125.5 13:48, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Не делали никаких вандальных действий? 5 января в 15:25 вы разблокировали себя на ruewiki используя свою куклу Словянин. Далее через 27 минут вы использовали свою учётную запись KHMELNYTSKYIA для переименования Діскузія:Білорусія в Діскузія:Білорусь. Далее вплоть до 18:55 идут различные правки совершенные KHMELNYTSKYIA, когда эта ваша кукла прекращает свою активность. Через две минуты просыпается Словянин, который спал пока KHMELNYTSKYIA была активна. При этом вся активность исходила из одного и того же IP. UAs тоже полностью совпадают. На странице uk:Вікіпереворот у Русинській Вікіпедії написали, что стюарды "тупые". Поверьте это далеко не так. Так что всё идёт к тому, что ваша основная учётная запись останется "локнутой" навсегда. Ruslik (talk) 17:54, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
Я уже говорил, что данний IP-адрес используют многие и любой, кто ним пользуется, мог создать соответствующих пользователей. Более того, провайдер время от времени меняет IP-адрес. Поэтому не следует говорить, что это мои виртуалы.
Разблокировал меня Славянин потому, что я попросил его об этом. Честно это или нет. Возможно и нет. Но я не прошу меня разблокировать в русинской википедии. Я не против блокировки моего аккаунта в данной википедии, только потому что она мне не нужна.
Я действительно переименовал страницу Беларусь, потому что об этом попросил на странице обсуждения данной статьи белорусский пользователь. Это не вандализм. Затем я исправил страницу об Автономной Республике Крым, потому что это попросил сделать пользователь Ymblanter. Это также не вандализм. Всего я сделал 8 поправок в русинской википедии. Ни одна из них не вандальна.
Как я просмотрел историю правок Славянин, он совершал определенные действия как до моего захода на сайт, так и после. Ну и что, что он зашел через 2 минуты. В такое время (вечернее время) многие и делают большинство правок. В этом нет ничего удивительного.
Страница uk:Вікіпереворот у Русинській Вікіпедії вообще неясно что это. Она и еще удалена.
Вы можете увидеть мой глобальный вклад. Я не совершаю вандального действия, в чем вы можете убедиться, просмотрев любой википроект, любой. Кроме злосчастной русинской википедии, меня заблокировали только в татарской. И не из-за вандализма или неконструктивные действия. А потому, что возникла проблема с моим именем: Reason: # 9 Uygun olmayan kullanıcı adı (Неправильное имя пользователя).
Я внес свой вклад в украинскую википедию и викитеку. Для меня очень важно иметь доступ к данным проектам. Если возможно разблокируйте меня хоть в этих 2 проектах. Хочу сказать, что я создал новый подобный аккаунт как мой удаленний. KHMELNYTSKYIY (talk) 18:55, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- Please note that according to Policy blocking is internal business of local Wikipedia's. Global lock should be exceptional for multi-wiki vandal accounts. User KHMELNYTSKYIA has no destructive contribution in Ukrainian projects. His blocking status in Ukrainian projects should be accorded to Ukrainian rules and Ukrainian community. Artem.komisarenko (talk) 21:08, 30 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- This is exactly a "multi-wiki vandal account". Ruslik (talk) 17:42, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
- @KHMELNYTSKYIA, пожалуйста, признайте, что акаунт Словянин создали вы. Это мог сделать любой, но это сделали именно вы. В частности, вас выдала история страницы Доповідь розвідки США «Оцінки діяльності та намірів Росії на недавніх американських виборах» в украинских Вікіджерелах, где вы перепутали акаунты и вместо KHMELNYTSKYIA вычитывали с акаунта Словянин («администратора русинской Википедии»). Пожалуйста, признайте, что акаунт Словянин создали именно вы. Отрицанием очевидного вы делаете только хуже, так как разблокировка в этом случае будет невозможной.
- @Ruslik0, с другой стороны, у участника KHMELNYTSKYIA был очевидно полезный вклад в украинской Википедии и Викитеке (в последней он был одним из самых активных участников) и на Мете (переводы на украинский). Фактически выходит, что вред от деятельности участника затрагивает исключительно русинскую Википедию, в то время как в других проектах у него полезный вклад. К сожалению, участник не указал электронной почты или другого контакта, а глобальный лок не позволяет участнику ни активировать википочту, ни править свою страницу обсуждения, поэтому возможность связаться с ним отсутствует. Поэтому хотелось бы узнать, в каком формате возможно обсуждение разблокировки участника — NickK (talk) 13:24, 31 January 2017 (UTC) Reply
Печкуров
Добрый день. Т. к. запрос Steward requests/Global как-то в полусделанном состоянии подзавис, на всякий случай стучусь сюда на предмет того, что я ещё одну учетку там приписал. Определённо надо переходить в ЧЮ-рассылку, через неё все бодрее происходит; меня, однако, смущает там мое беканье-меканье на дурном английском--OneLittleMouse (talk) 20:04, 5 February 2017 (UTC) Reply
Please help
here otvette pojalusta